Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 8:41 am UTC    
June 18, 2010 12:27AM
Clive then gets into some meat when he shows us how the orbital periods of the inner planets are shown by the chronology of "The Patriarchs".

First allow me to freshen your mind as to what they are.

Mercury 87.97 days (88 days and piano keys)
Venus 224.7 days
Earth 365.2466 days (365 days)
Mars 686.97 days (687 days)


In some brilliant out of the box thinking Clive has shown some amazing co-incidences and here they are. Please I wish to emphasize that what follows is all Clive's ideas.

The first thing he does is to remind everyone of the obviousness of Enoch with the 365 and 687 both showing the orbital periods of Earth and Mars in Earth Days. But he does not stop there. First allow me to post the totals as they stand now.



Larger image: [donbarone.selfip.net]

Here is what Clive has to say:

"Counting the years as days then from the year 325 to 1056 is two Earth years (731 days). There are three sets of numbers where the difference amounts to three Earth years (approx 1096 days); from the year 460 to 1556, 622 to 1721 (3 x 366.33 days) and 687 to 1785 (3 x 366 days)

Venus is represented from the year 235 to 460, one complete orbit around The Sun. From 1656 to 2106 equals two orbits, 622 to 2196 as seven orbits and 395 to 2196 equals eight orbits. Clive Ross: 1o6 The Dawn of Man - page 163


Here is the image that shows what Clive is bringing our attention to:



Larger image: [donbarone.selfip.net]

He further states on this same page, page 163 that:

"Mercury is represented more times than any of the inner planets. This plan[e]t has a period of 87.9 days and the most obvious one is 874, only five days short from ten complete orbits around The Sun. Some may question this small discrepancy but it is the very next number on the list, the year 1056, it equaling twelve complete orbits and reconfirmed from the year 1847 equaling exactly twenty-one orbits."

I think that Clive had conclusively proven that the numbers as shown and listed in Genesis, the so called word of God, are related to the cycles of our solar system. It seems too far a stretch to believe that this is all coincidence.

The Book of Genesis is supposed to have been written by Moses who is alleged to have been a great and learned person in ancient Egypt. I find it very interesting that some of the same ratios that Clive found at Giza are also being found in this first book of the Pentateuch. However Moses wasn't nearly done yet and there is much more still to follow.

Best
Don Barone


"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db
Subject Author Posted

"1o6 The Dawn of Man"

Don Barone June 16, 2010 06:45AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man"

Hermione June 16, 2010 07:58AM

"1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

Don Barone June 17, 2010 09:34AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

cladking June 17, 2010 10:50AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

Don Barone June 17, 2010 09:54PM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

Don Barone June 18, 2010 12:27AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

Hermione June 21, 2010 11:15AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

Hermione June 17, 2010 11:57AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": And these are the generations of Adam and his descendants

Don Barone June 17, 2010 12:06PM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man"

Don Barone July 23, 2010 08:52AM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": More on Logarithms

Don Barone July 23, 2010 03:15PM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": More on Logarithms

Don Barone July 23, 2010 03:33PM

Re: "1o6 The Dawn of Man": More on Logarithms

Don Barone July 23, 2010 06:31PM

Friggin' pathetic

lobo-hotei July 23, 2010 09:13PM

Re: Friggin' pathetic

Khazar-khum July 24, 2010 12:23AM

Hercule Poirot

Anthony July 24, 2010 02:52PM

Re: Friggin' pathetic

Don Barone July 25, 2010 07:19PM

Re: Friggin' pathetic

Khazar-khum July 25, 2010 07:51PM

Re: Friggin' pathetic

lobo-hotei July 25, 2010 10:57PM

Re: Friggin' pathetic

lobo-hotei July 25, 2010 11:04PM

Re: Friggin' pathetic

Hermione July 26, 2010 01:52AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login