Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 1:57 pm UTC    
June 02, 2010 05:57PM
>>sO... How come if I erase the number that represents the item/concept/structure and replace it with a different number, there is no change in the original item? Wouldn't that prove no interrelationship between the two whatever, except in the imagination?<<
What are you trying to say? If a student changes the decimal mark in the acceleration of gravity equation on the blackboard why doesn't he start flying? Meaning this is proof that the acceleration of gravity has no interrelationship with it's representation?
Subject Author Posted

The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Jammer June 02, 2010 01:12PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 01:46PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Sirfiroth June 02, 2010 05:56PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Ogygos June 02, 2010 05:57PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Don Barone June 02, 2010 08:08PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Rick Baudé June 02, 2010 11:55PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Jammer June 03, 2010 09:14AM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Ogygos June 03, 2010 11:25AM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Jammer June 03, 2010 11:50AM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Ogygos June 03, 2010 12:30PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Jammer June 03, 2010 03:06PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Ogygos June 03, 2010 04:32PM

Re: The flaw in Numerology, Attn Oggy

Rick Baudé June 03, 2010 01:50PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login