Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hope any/everyone joins this thread, feel free.
>
>
> Here is what I consider a significant flaw is in
> numerology;
>
> If numerology is supposedly the occult influence
> between physical substances, the numbers that
> contain or express the concept, and an ancient
> science that offeres understanding through
> contemplation of these interrelationships.
>
> Now, if we try and follow the logic, a quartz
> resonates at a certain frequency. It also
> establishes a weak magnetic field doing so. If you
> artificially change that magnetic field, you also
> change the frequency that quartz resonates at.
> Cause and effect, and the inter-Relationship.
>
> sO... How come if I erase the number that
> represents the item/concept/structure and replace
> it with a different number, there is no change in
> the original item? Wouldn't that prove no
> interrelationship between the two whatever, except
> in the imagination?
>
> At least that's the only scientific test I could
> come up with to test the supposed principles of
> numerology... anyone have a different test?
>
> Jammer

this is not a test(sounds like a Conelrad warning)...

I merely make the following observation..

TTBOMK..



The number of planets has changed many times over the last century, while the numerologic extraplotions based on the number of planets remains the same.



warwick




" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019