Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 3, 2024, 8:22 am UTC    
June 01, 2010 02:14PM
Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok, your hypothesis is sound and supportive of
> their belief system, resistance to change, and the
> complications of holding to a standard in the days
> before industrialization* also.


It's a different mindset, but that's the whole point in studying it, isn't it? To ferret out the differences? What's the point in studying it to prove it was exactly the same as something else?


>
> It also falls within the measured variations, both
> as forecast by Petrie, and existant in the actual
> cubit examples we have recovered.

Odd how that works, isn't it?



>
> Therefore I allow it is as plausible, perhaps even
> more plausible, than my (I think far sexier)
> theory each pyramid was built using a cubit that
> was specific to THAT Pharaoh.


I like yours, but there is no textual reference to support it.

There is, however, evidence that suggests this explanation is more plausible.



>
> I've said in many posts, the requirement was all
> the cubits in use on one construct be identical,
> not that cubits used on different constructs be.

Absolutely.

Puts a whole new spin on the Saqqara Ostracon, doesn't it?



>
> And yes, I have noticed and posted the one example
> that doesn't appear to exist anywhere is the
> "Phantom Phi Cubit" another has based his entire
> mathmatical hypothesis on.
>


I didn't even bother looking. Why waste the time?



>
> "Phee, Phi, Pho, Phum, I smell the blood..." etc.

He's not English.



>
> * PS; As an example, in the days before
> industrialization individual parts on firearms
> were NOT interchangeable. A trigger assembly hand
> fitted for one long rifle could not, without
> adjustments, be used on another. After
> industrialization one could take all the loose
> parts of a dozen Colt Peacemakers, and rebuild a
> functional 13th from the others. This is an
> absolute fact, and cannot be ignored in a theory
> that shouts standardization.

Exactly. The cubit rods used on Khufu's pyramid would not have been functional on Khafre's, and even less so on Menkaure's.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.
Subject Author Posted

Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 30, 2010 09:07AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Anthony May 31, 2010 06:29AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 31, 2010 07:50AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 09:29AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

JonnyMcA May 31, 2010 10:40AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 10:45AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 31, 2010 10:49AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 11:10AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 31, 2010 11:22AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 11:31AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 31, 2010 11:41AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 12:12PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 31, 2010 12:32PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 12:55PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Sirfiroth May 31, 2010 04:45PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 08:27PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Sirfiroth May 31, 2010 04:44PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone May 31, 2010 09:14PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 09:27PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Ogygos June 01, 2010 01:11AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 01:21AM

Petrie's measurements

Jammer June 01, 2010 10:23AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Jammer June 03, 2010 03:03PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone June 03, 2010 03:15PM

Petrie's measurements

Jammer June 03, 2010 04:12PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Don Barone June 03, 2010 04:27PM

Evidence?

Anthony June 03, 2010 06:39PM

Re: Evidence?

Don Barone June 03, 2010 06:47PM

Re: Evidence?

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 07:55PM

Re: Evidence?

Don Barone June 03, 2010 08:41PM

Re: Evidence?

Warwick L Nixon June 03, 2010 10:04PM

Re: Evidence?

Don Barone June 03, 2010 10:15PM

Re: Evidence?

Warwick L Nixon June 04, 2010 12:00AM

You've seriously proven my point.

Anthony June 05, 2010 03:12PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Don Barone June 05, 2010 07:06PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Anthony June 06, 2010 08:05AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Hermione June 06, 2010 08:29AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Don Barone June 06, 2010 08:46AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 09:15AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Don Barone June 06, 2010 09:32AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 10:22AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Sirfiroth June 06, 2010 11:34AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Tommi Huhtamaki June 06, 2010 11:56AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Sirfiroth June 06, 2010 12:25PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Tommi Huhtamaki June 06, 2010 12:31PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Sirfiroth June 06, 2010 01:02PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Tommi Huhtamaki June 06, 2010 01:12PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 10:16PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Don Barone June 06, 2010 10:41PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 11:07PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 11:35PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Don Barone June 06, 2010 11:43PM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Don Barone June 07, 2010 12:01AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Warwick L Nixon June 07, 2010 10:35AM

Re: You've seriously proven my point.

Anthony June 06, 2010 03:06PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH May 31, 2010 09:23PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 09:32PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Sirfiroth May 31, 2010 10:49PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon May 31, 2010 11:49PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH June 01, 2010 01:13AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 01, 2010 07:04AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 09:07AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH June 01, 2010 06:48PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 02, 2010 12:54AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH June 03, 2010 02:59AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 03, 2010 01:45PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH June 05, 2010 12:56AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 05, 2010 06:40PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Sirfiroth June 06, 2010 12:07AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 09:11AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Sirfiroth June 06, 2010 12:09PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 11:00PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Sirfiroth June 07, 2010 09:21PM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 08, 2010 07:53AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH June 06, 2010 02:31AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

lobo-hotei June 06, 2010 10:10AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

RLH June 01, 2010 01:06AM

Correct

Anthony June 01, 2010 11:09AM

Re: Correct

Jammer June 01, 2010 12:30PM

Replicative Fading and Comparing Cubits

Anthony June 01, 2010 12:54PM

Replicative Fading and Comparing Cubits

Jammer June 01, 2010 01:29PM

Re: Replicative Fading and Comparing Cubits

Anthony June 01, 2010 02:14PM

when is a cubit rod not a cubit rod?

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2010 05:27PM

when is a cubit rod not a cubit rod?

Jammer June 02, 2010 08:54AM

Re: when is a cubit rod not a cubit rod?

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2010 09:55AM

Re: when is a cubit rod not a cubit rod?

Anthony June 02, 2010 10:28AM

Re: Petrie's measurements

Jammer June 01, 2010 10:06AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login