Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 17, 2024, 5:30 am UTC    
April 06, 2010 01:33PM
Jammer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> A clear claim was made, documentation was
> requested, ...

Against my better judgement I've decided to respond to this post.

What I actually said was; "Anubis was most closely related to being God of Ropes." Perhaps I really should have phrased it a little more clearly. Anubis was the intelligence which operated the pyramid top. He is closer to being the "God of Ropes" than any other God and there was probably not an actual "God of Ropes". In other words he is most closely related to being the God of Ropes in comparison to any other God.

If built with counterweights a great deal of the activity on top of the pyramid was the operation of the ropes joining the ascenbders and cw's. There was mason activity and the filling of cw's with ballast. Other activity would be extensive and would support these primary tasks. Coordination of these jobs would necessarily be done from on top of the pyramid. Looking at this activity in a vacuum most of the most important work would be getting done by ropes and it was Anubis who was responsible for them.

Again some of these are deeply embedded in literal interpretation and explaining them in easy to grasp terms in this format can be nearly impossible. But I'll try to provide a minimum of interpretation where it's not obvious;

148d. Thy nose is (that of) Anubis, O Imperishable. Thy teeth are (those of) Sopdu, O Imperishable.
149a. Thine arms are Hp and Dwȝ-mw.t.f, which thou needest to ascend to heaven, when thou ascendest;
149b. thy legs are ’Imś.ti and Ḳbḥ-śn.w.f, which thou needest to descend to the lower heaven (underworld) when thou descendest.

Imperishable is the dead king and (as) the pyramid. Anubis is atop this as a nose and leading thereby.

Hp and Dwȝ-mw.t.f are sons of Horus and specifically those sons which operate the equipment of the south and east sides of the pyramid (specifically the Red Pyramid probably). Hp is the arms of the bull of heaven operated by Anubis and lifts stones up the south side. Nephthys is the Goddess of the ascender.

’Imś.ti is the legs which provides the lift which lifts the stones or pulls the oar which ferries the king over. Seker who is "chief of Lifts" is cool effervescent water which is reassembed in the []nw-boat to provide the ballast to build the king and is overseen by Anubis. Isis is the Goddess of these boats. M[]nty-irty is the God/ Goddess of the celestial cow or M[].t-wr't-cow which contains the upper eye of Horus and channels the water (Osiris) through the nurse canal to the nurse lake (queens chamber).

1364c. Anubis, who is chief of the sḥ-ntr, commands that thy spirit be behind thee, that thy might be in thy body,

All equipment and supplies were directed from the pyramid top and this certainly includes the storage, movement, and usage of natron.

1548b. Ḥȝpi, ’Imś.ti, Dwȝ-mw.t.f, Ḳbḥ-śn.w.f.
1549a. His head, his tail, his two hands, his two feet
1549b. belong to Anubis, who is upon his mountain; to Osiris who is chief of his department (or, thigh-offering).

The "head of the dead king" in this instance is the pyramid top.

1552c. Thou standest, thou sittest like Anubis, chief of the necropolis.

1553a. Aker stands up for thee; Shu dries (lit. something like. "lies down," Wb. V 366) for thee.
1553b. They tremble who see the inundation (when) it tosses;

This one's a little more vague but I believe that Osiris N is sitting when he standest. He takes the Eye of Horus to himself and stands in it in a stable manner he is seated in it. When he sits (or stands) in the eye then Anubis who sits (on his belly) atop the pyramid goes to work.

1375c. Neit is behind him; Śrḳt-ḥtw is before him.
1376a. The ropes are knotted; the boats of N. are tied together
1376b. for the son of Atum--hungry and thirsty, thirsty and hungry--
1376c. on the southern shore of the Winding Watercourse.

This could bbe the GP but I have no firm opinion yet.

This is what the ropes are doing; connecting the boats. The missing words are problematic here but hungry refers to the ascenders which bring the bread upon which the dead king lives (stone) and the cw's which are thirsty to do it.

1347b. his forward cable is taken by Isis; his stern cable is seized by Nephthys.

Isis pulls, Nephthys follows.

138c. thou descendest on firm (copper?) cables, on the shoulders of Horus in his name of "He who is in the Ḥnw-boat."

"Firm" probably means taut.

2080b. the ropes which are on it are made solid
2080c. by means of sinews of Gȝśw.ti, the bull of heaven;

Again, taut.

Other references will take more effort to find since they are not explicit.



> Since you have claimed publicly many times "a ramp
> would use far more material than the pyramid
> itself" perhaps you might care to comment on the
> errors in your calculations?

This is untrue.

I have claimed many times that a single straight on ramp with a manageable slope would consume far more work than the pyramid itself. Other ramps are excluded by the evidence.

> This is exactly the same type of ramp and at the
> same approach angles and heights that you have
> previously been directed to observe and reflect
> on?

Until it's shown the mud bricks flew up or aliens helped I have no interest whatsoever in how the little pyramids were built. It is simply irrelevent to the great pyramids until it can be proven that the same means was used. Of course this CAN'T happen until we know how the great pyramids were ACTUALLY constructed.




____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

The PT by the numbers

cladking March 27, 2010 12:47AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Chris Tedder March 27, 2010 06:06AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 27, 2010 10:48AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Chris Tedder March 27, 2010 05:13PM

Rasetjau (Rostau)

Anthony March 27, 2010 02:25PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

Anthony March 27, 2010 02:54PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

cladking March 27, 2010 03:08PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

Anthony March 27, 2010 04:29PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

Chris Tedder March 27, 2010 04:59PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

cladking March 27, 2010 05:58PM

sand

Chris Tedder March 28, 2010 03:52AM

Re: sand

cladking March 28, 2010 01:31PM

Re: sand

Anthony March 28, 2010 07:54PM

Re: sand

cladking March 28, 2010 08:44PM

Re: sand

Khazar-khum March 29, 2010 12:56AM

Re: sand

cladking March 29, 2010 04:35PM

Re: sand

Anthony March 29, 2010 05:46AM

Re: sand

cladking March 29, 2010 05:04PM

Re: sand

Anthony March 30, 2010 05:38AM

Re: sand

Jammer March 30, 2010 03:25PM

Re: sand

cladking March 30, 2010 04:41PM

Re: sand

Warwick L Nixon March 31, 2010 11:51AM

Re: sand

cladking March 31, 2010 05:17PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

Pistol March 27, 2010 09:35PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

cladking March 27, 2010 10:02PM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

Chris Tedder March 28, 2010 03:12AM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

cladking April 02, 2010 09:12PM

primaeval mound

Chris Tedder April 03, 2010 03:02AM

Re: primaeval mound

cladking April 03, 2010 11:54AM

Re: primaeval mound

cladking April 03, 2010 11:14PM

primaeval mound - step pyramid - blueprint found ? maybe

clem ciamarra April 03, 2010 11:59PM

Re: primaeval mound - step pyramid - blueprint found ? maybe

Chris Tedder April 04, 2010 02:40AM

Re: primaeval mound - step pyramid - blueprint found ? maybe

clem ciamarra April 04, 2010 03:11AM

Re: primaeval mound

Chris Tedder April 04, 2010 02:33AM

What's in a name?

Anthony April 04, 2010 07:33AM

Re: What's in a name?

Hermione April 04, 2010 08:27AM

Re: What's in a name?

Anthony April 04, 2010 09:37AM

Re: Rasetjau (Rostau)

Hermione April 03, 2010 03:02AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

GChase March 27, 2010 06:59AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Chris Tedder March 27, 2010 08:27AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 27, 2010 10:26PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 27, 2010 10:16PM

...but what numbers?

cladking March 27, 2010 11:49PM

Re: ...but what numbers?

Byrd March 28, 2010 07:40PM

Re: ...but what numbers?

cladking March 28, 2010 08:30PM

Re: ...but what numbers?

Anthony March 29, 2010 08:09AM

Re: ...but what numbers?

Hermione March 29, 2010 10:07AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Byrd March 28, 2010 07:28PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 28, 2010 09:11PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Charly March 30, 2010 11:19AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 30, 2010 11:32AM

Excellent Reference

Anthony March 30, 2010 11:34AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 30, 2010 11:42AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Anthony March 30, 2010 11:47AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 30, 2010 12:12PM

Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon March 31, 2010 11:58AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Hermione March 31, 2010 12:01PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon March 31, 2010 12:08PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Hermione March 31, 2010 12:35PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon March 31, 2010 02:16PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking March 31, 2010 04:54PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Khazar-khum March 31, 2010 08:22PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking March 31, 2010 09:41PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Khazar-khum March 31, 2010 11:04PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking March 31, 2010 11:19PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking March 31, 2010 04:36PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon April 01, 2010 10:02AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking April 02, 2010 09:15PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 10:47AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking April 03, 2010 10:52AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 11:15AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking April 03, 2010 11:27AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 11:44AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking April 03, 2010 11:58AM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 12:05PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Hermione April 03, 2010 12:37PM

oops

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 01:28PM

Re: oops

Khazar-khum April 03, 2010 04:02PM

Re: oops

Anthony April 03, 2010 04:07PM

Please, everyone ...

Hermione April 03, 2010 04:24PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

Khazar-khum April 01, 2010 03:43PM

Echoing my thoughts

Anthony April 01, 2010 07:14PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking April 04, 2010 02:49PM

FTR

Warwick L Nixon April 05, 2010 10:49AM

FTR

Jammer April 05, 2010 12:29PM

Re: FTR

Anthony April 05, 2010 12:42PM

Re: FTR

Khazar-khum April 05, 2010 02:53PM

Giza

Anthony April 05, 2010 03:09PM

Re: FTR

cladking April 05, 2010 03:47PM

Re: FTR

Khazar-khum April 05, 2010 10:28PM

Re: Please answer the simple question...

cladking March 31, 2010 04:14PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

GChase March 30, 2010 12:10PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 31, 2010 05:13PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

GChase April 02, 2010 04:14AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Morten March 30, 2010 02:00PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Greg Reeder March 30, 2010 04:58PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Anthony March 30, 2010 05:48PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Morten March 31, 2010 05:41AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 31, 2010 05:24PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking March 31, 2010 05:10PM

Re: The PT by the numbers

Charly April 01, 2010 03:06AM

Re: The PT by the numbers

cladking April 01, 2010 02:56PM

Re: The PT by the numbers - slight correction

Anthony March 29, 2010 08:06AM

Re: The PT by the numbers - slight correction

cladking March 29, 2010 05:16PM

How to revise translations 101

Anthony March 29, 2010 08:21AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking March 29, 2010 05:42PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Warwick L Nixon April 01, 2010 11:45AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 01, 2010 02:49PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Warwick L Nixon April 01, 2010 03:22PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Khazar-khum April 01, 2010 03:46PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 01, 2010 04:56PM

Dazzle me.

Anthony April 01, 2010 07:21PM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 02, 2010 09:37PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Hermione April 03, 2010 03:33AM

Re: Dazzle me.

Jammer April 03, 2010 05:30AM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 03, 2010 11:08AM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 03, 2010 10:50AM

Re: Dazzle me.

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 11:00AM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 03, 2010 11:22AM

Re: Dazzle me.

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 11:39AM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 03, 2010 04:16PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Anthony April 03, 2010 04:19PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Jammer April 05, 2010 12:36PM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 05, 2010 03:56PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Khazar-khum April 05, 2010 10:30PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Khazar-khum April 03, 2010 04:09PM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 03, 2010 04:26PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Jammer April 05, 2010 12:52PM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 05, 2010 04:06PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Jammer April 06, 2010 07:36AM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 06, 2010 01:33PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Khazar-khum April 06, 2010 02:48PM

Re: Dazzle me.

cladking April 06, 2010 03:19PM

the pigs asked the wolf

Warwick L Nixon April 06, 2010 03:27PM

Re: the pigs asked the wolf

cladking April 06, 2010 04:09PM

Re: the pigs asked the wolf

Khazar-khum April 06, 2010 06:32PM

Re: the pigs asked the wolf

cladking April 06, 2010 07:20PM

Re: the pigs asked the wolf

Hermione April 06, 2010 07:43PM

Re: the pigs asked the wolf

cladking April 06, 2010 07:52PM

Dazzle me doesn't mean with BS!

Jammer April 07, 2010 11:12AM

Re: Dazzle me doesn't mean with BS!

cladking April 07, 2010 04:21PM

Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

Anthony April 03, 2010 02:10PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

cladking April 03, 2010 04:58PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

Anthony April 03, 2010 05:43PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

cladking April 03, 2010 07:42PM

Less than dazzling. these points aren't even scintillating!

Jammer April 05, 2010 02:27PM

Re: Less than dazzling. these points aren't even scintillating!

cladking April 05, 2010 04:35PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

lobo-hotei April 03, 2010 07:54PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

cladking April 03, 2010 08:36PM

Time for some evidence!

Hermione April 04, 2010 08:15AM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Anthony April 04, 2010 10:14AM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Warwick L Nixon April 04, 2010 10:58AM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 04, 2010 11:32AM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Hermione April 04, 2010 11:59AM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Anthony April 04, 2010 12:17PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 04, 2010 02:27PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Khazar-khum April 05, 2010 03:04PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Anthony April 05, 2010 03:32PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 05, 2010 04:49PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 05, 2010 04:47PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Khazar-khum April 05, 2010 10:35PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 04, 2010 02:03PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Lee April 05, 2010 01:19PM

Time for some evidence!

Jammer April 05, 2010 02:39PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

Lee April 05, 2010 04:51PM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 05, 2010 05:07PM

Time for some evidence!

Jammer April 06, 2010 07:44AM

Re: Time for some evidence!

cladking April 05, 2010 05:00PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

Khazar-khum April 03, 2010 09:56PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

cladking April 03, 2010 10:51PM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a longshot.

Khazar-khum April 04, 2010 03:37AM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a Lobo-shot.

Anthony April 04, 2010 06:33AM

Re: Less than dazzling. By a Lobo-shot.

Khazar-khum April 05, 2010 03:05PM

Re: Dazzle me.

clem ciamarra April 03, 2010 10:57AM

Re: Dazzle me.

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 11:04AM

Re: Dazzle me.

clem ciamarra April 03, 2010 12:06PM

Re: Dazzle me.

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 12:08PM

Re: Dazzle me.

clem ciamarra April 03, 2010 12:20PM

hieroglyphic transcription of PT's online here

Greg Reeder April 03, 2010 11:48AM

Re: hieroglyphic transcription of PT's online here

cladking April 03, 2010 05:05PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 01, 2010 03:47PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Anthony April 01, 2010 07:23PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 02, 2010 09:47PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 10:56AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 03, 2010 11:46AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Warwick L Nixon April 03, 2010 11:59AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 03, 2010 05:22PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Jammer April 05, 2010 03:06PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 05, 2010 05:27PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Jammer April 06, 2010 07:53AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Anthony April 06, 2010 09:45AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 06, 2010 12:06PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Warwick L Nixon April 06, 2010 10:23AM

Re: How to revise translations 101

cladking April 06, 2010 12:00PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Khazar-khum April 06, 2010 02:53PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Warwick L Nixon April 06, 2010 03:10PM

Re: How to revise translations 101

Khazar-khum April 06, 2010 06:35PM

cladking, PLEASE,

Jammer April 07, 2010 10:51AM

Re: cladking, PLEASE,

Warwick L Nixon April 07, 2010 11:12AM

Waste of Time

Greg Reeder April 06, 2010 08:00PM

**Moderation request**

Hermione April 06, 2010 08:05PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login