Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jammer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Clive, the assumption that one can ignore
> what
> > they actually WROTE in preference to what
> you
> > believe you can imply from structure layout
> has
> > several vulnerable keystones.
>
> Jammer....!
>
> How can you be so naive.

Wait one moment, because I don't infer the secret encoding you do from the structures I am automatically naive?

> The papyrus that is being discussed is a series of
> math "problems"...you could call it a math exam.
> There is absolutely no evidence in the document
> declaring the works as "discoveries" or new
> mathematical "finds".
> This writing is not the "limit" of AE's math
> ability as you claim...it had to be of a higher
> level just to prepare the document.
> Now please...give it a rest.

Ah, and there it is; translated; "if you disagree with my ideas, kindly shut up."

> <Jammer> "1) That what your have created is accurate in the absence of any direct
> evidence."

> <Clive> But the pyramids "are" direct evidence, they couldn't be any more direct...you can
> even climb on them...!

And I deduce they could design and construct, these impressive square structures without the knowledge of Imaginary Numbers, Trigonometry, or Higher Math. Let alone the idea they are a secret code.

> > <Jammer> 2) That what they actually wrote was either a deliberate blind or at least
> written by one ignorant of the higher math mysteries.

> <Clive> "Do you realize what you are writing?"

Yes, the exact question was carefully worded, not typed randomly by 1,000 monkeys, in spite of the cliche.

> Why don't "you" try composing a story relating to
> your life's mathematical experiences?
> I'll guarantee that you cannot remember everything
> you were taught.

I am not senile (yet). I remember everything I was taught that I USE. I assume the AE didn't have doddering old scribes who forgot their teachings make up their exams.

> Therefore, according to your
> logic, the finished document would express your
> mathematical limits, although you were taught
> higher levels in that subject.
> Best.
> Clive

So, after allowing I am a senile, naive fool who doesn't even realize what he is typing, you wish me "the best"? For a verbal beat down I think you've already rendered it.

Clive, I thought we were discussing two sides of this discussion.
I hadn't realized how trying my thoughts were to you.

Jammer