Hermione Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I make no claims for my own understanding of this
> (or any other) situation. However, I've never
> seen anything in your posts over the years to
> persuade me that you have a better grasp of the
> situation at Giza than any of the recognized
> experts
Hermione:
If you lack full understanding of astronomy then I anticipate you would have difficulty...that's common to many individuals today.
(for instance, I've never yet come across
> any convincing evidence that the AE were aware of,
> or took any interest in, such questions as
> planetary revolutions, etc. etc.)
I know...neither have I. Odd how those "recognized" experts avoid the topic, yet the average Egyptian of today will tell you a different story.
> Nor have I seen anything to convince me that the Giza was designed
> as an integrated whole.
You stated already that you are limited in certain subjects. Am I correct in assuming mathematics is also part and parcel?
> or that the AE left any documentary
> evidence of the existence of such a plan.
Please...using this one is lame.
> Furthermore, I see that, in another sub-thread,
> Jon Bodsworth mentions that he has tried several
> times to explain some technical evidence about
> pyramid casing-stones to you, and that you have
> apparently not taken any notice of this evidence.
Actually Hermione, I take a great deal of time expanding on his beliefs and posts as well as mine.
The issue is the belief of angular casing stones covering G1 completely.
The argument is not new or unique; it was in constant debate until several base stones were uncovered about 150 years ago. A few stones uncovered and the imagination goes to work…suddenly the complete structure was covered. Unfortunately, like many quick-thinking theories/assumptions of old, there are too many holes in the theory, but Jon refuses to explai/expand or answer what is asked of him. All that I do is provide the physical illustrations developed from records.
> Why don't you try and get to grips with existing evidence,
That is all that I use...existing "evidence"...not texts..!
> telling everyone that you have the answer,
> when everything you say reveals that you
> patently have nothing of the kind?
The Giza structures are huge and so is their story.
For the last week I have illustrated several drawings of the Kc as requested, along with detailed descriptions of the mathematical make-up in its design. It's simple...nothing complicated...but it's the same thing all over again.
Many who asked suddenly disappear into the woodwork, several do hang in, but eventually they drift away…until I post another segment from my book and then the process repeats.
Best part is....my presentations are mathematically correct and many are becoming aware that there is more to Giza than first anticipated.
No...I don't have "all" of the answers, but I do know many of them.
Best.
Clive
