Jim Alison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does this equality provide support for the
> proposed baselengths and pyramid angles, and
> support for the idea of a unified site plan?

Not really Jim.

The math is correct...but G3 must be 201.3Rc as recorded by Petrie.
Since others are unaware why this measure then they have assumed a 200 Rc length and that is far from the truth. You have repeated the error and assumed incorrect angles.

Also...
To confirm the site as a "unified" plan you must link the three structures together using a measuring system common to all and in all directions.

> This is a margin of error of less than four one
> thousandths of one cubit over a distance of 1732
> cubits, or an error of less than one-tenth of an
> inch over a distance of over half a mile.

Having read your assumed values...there are simply too many discrepancies between yours and Petrie’s, therefore your statement does not hold true.

I believe this is what you are referring to. Hope you don’t object to my voice overlay.
[www.wsville.com]

Best.
Clive