Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 2, 2024, 10:04 am UTC    
October 26, 2007 07:14PM
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Again:
>
> There's just no question that there is some sort
> of mathe-
> matical relationship between these pyramids.


I've never stated anything to the contrary.

What is NOT a part of real Egyptology, though, is these baseless assertions that the mathematical relationships found by modern pyramid enthusiasts using autocad programs and aerial photography were of any consequence to the Dynasty IV builders of the structures.


> The
> corners do
> not align with the setting sun on the solstice
> through mere
> coincidence.
>


It is not something you can just assert. You must prove it. To do that, you'll need evidence from the Dynasty IV pyramid builders, or perhaps some literature they passed down, that suggests your interpretation of potentially unrelated data points is actually viable.

Until you have that evidence, then it is just another "really cool coincidence" that can be found at Giza.

Allow me to give you a few examples of corroborating evidence from other cultures at other times... yet both involve pyramids.

The pyramid of Chichen Itza, for example, has a peculiar effect of sunlight associated with it. Allow me to quote:

Quote

The phenomenon that El Castillo is famous for occurs twice each year, at the spring and fall equinoxes. (In fact, the effect is viewable for a week before and after each equinox.) As the equinox sun sets, a play of light and shadow creates the appearance of a snake that gradually undulates down the stairway of the pyramid. This diamond-backed snake is composed of seven or so triangular shadows, cast by the stepped terraces of the pyramid. The sinking sun seems to give life to the sinuous shadows, which make a decidedly snaky pattern on their way down the stairs.

Thousands of people gather to see this phenomenon, which may have been viewed by the ancient Maya as the manifestation of the god Kukulkán, the feathered serpent. But was the effect intentional, or merely a happy accident?

It isn’t possible to read the minds of the Maya who built the structure in roughly AD 1000, but various signs suggest the effect was deliberately created. The most obvious of those signs are the large snake-head sculptures carved into the base of the stairway. As the shadow moves down the stairway, the body of the snake ultimately unites with one of these enormous heads. [www.exploratorium.edu]

That is tough to dismiss as a coincidence.

Or, here's another example, oddly enough drawn from the same pyramid:

Quote

Clap your hands in front of the 1,100-year-old Temple of Kukulcan, in the ancient Mayan city of Chichen Itza, and, to some researchers' ears, the pyramid answers in the voice of the sacred quetzal bird. [news.nationalgeographic.com]

The knowledge of the quetzal bird being sacred is corroborating evidence for this hypothesis. Your shadow lines have no corroborating evidence, any more than pyramid circles, quarter based solutions, phi diagrams, or any of the other "I spilled my spaghetti on Giza and look at what it made!" speculations that litter the internet.

Khufu was buried in Khufu's tomb... he won't be found under a building in a Cairo suburb.



Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.
Subject Author Posted

The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

Don Barone October 24, 2007 06:21AM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

fmetrol October 24, 2007 07:11AM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

Don Barone October 24, 2007 07:26AM

I agree

Anthony October 24, 2007 09:34AM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 24, 2007 10:09AM

Re: I agree

Don Barone October 24, 2007 05:04PM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 24, 2007 10:11PM

Re: I agree

Don Barone October 25, 2007 11:27AM

Bad foundation

Anthony October 25, 2007 12:08PM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 25, 2007 04:45PM

Re: I agree

Don Barone October 25, 2007 05:20PM

Re: I agree

lobo-hotei October 25, 2007 05:42PM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 25, 2007 06:06PM

Re: I agree

Don Barone October 25, 2007 06:28PM

A curious addendum ...

Don Barone October 25, 2007 06:37PM

Re: A curious addendum ...

fmetrol October 26, 2007 08:44AM

Re: I agree

Don Barone October 25, 2007 07:40PM

Re: I agree

lobo-hotei October 25, 2007 05:24PM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 25, 2007 05:36PM

Re: I agree

lobo-hotei October 25, 2007 05:45PM

Phi Agree

Anthony October 29, 2007 09:48AM

Re: I agree

cladking October 25, 2007 05:54PM

Re: I agree

Anthony October 26, 2007 06:24AM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 26, 2007 08:42AM

Re: I agree

Don Barone October 25, 2007 04:06PM

Re: I agree

fmetrol October 25, 2007 04:58PM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

C Wayne Taylor October 26, 2007 04:10AM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

fmetrol October 26, 2007 08:40AM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

C Wayne Taylor October 26, 2007 09:26AM

Your flawed assumption

Anthony October 26, 2007 10:03AM

Re: Your flawed assumption

cladking October 26, 2007 01:48PM

Argument by assertion...

Anthony October 28, 2007 08:37PM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

fmetrol October 26, 2007 10:09AM

Get ready...

Anthony October 26, 2007 12:32PM

Re: Get ready...

cladking October 26, 2007 01:49PM

Re: Get ready...

Don Barone October 26, 2007 02:14PM

Re: Get ready...

cladking October 26, 2007 02:45PM

Re: Get ready...

Don Barone October 26, 2007 06:05PM

Re: Get ready...

Don Barone October 26, 2007 06:41PM

Re: Get ready...

cladking October 26, 2007 06:48PM

Re: Get ready...

Don Barone October 26, 2007 07:54PM

Re: Get ready...

Jammer November 01, 2007 01:34PM

Re: Get ready...

Anthony October 26, 2007 07:14PM

Re: Get ready...

MJ Thomas October 27, 2007 09:12AM

Re: Get ready...

Kanga October 28, 2007 03:29AM

Re: Get ready...

Anthony October 28, 2007 05:44AM

Re: Get ready...

MJ Thomas October 28, 2007 06:22AM

Re: Get ready...

Don Barone October 28, 2007 06:46AM

Re: Get ready...

MJ Thomas October 28, 2007 05:29PM

Re: Get ready...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 05:50PM

Re: Get ready...

MJ Thomas October 28, 2007 06:08PM

Re: Get ready...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 06:19PM

Re: Get ready...

MJ Thomas October 29, 2007 08:38AM

Re: Get ready...

fmetrol October 29, 2007 10:12AM

Master Plans, Aliens and Power Plants of Giza

Anthony October 29, 2007 10:03AM

Re: Master Plans, Aliens and Power Plants of Giza

fmetrol October 29, 2007 10:31AM

Re: Master Plans, Aliens and Power Plants of Giza

Don Barone October 29, 2007 11:02AM

Re: Master Plans, Aliens and Power Plants of Giza

Anthony October 29, 2007 12:19PM

250 cubits...

Anthony October 28, 2007 08:58AM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 09:54AM

Re: 250 cubits...

Hermione October 28, 2007 11:10AM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 11:26AM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 03:28PM

Re: 250 cubits...

Hermione October 28, 2007 04:23PM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 04:43PM

Re: 250 cubits...

Hermione October 29, 2007 07:53AM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 29, 2007 09:53AM

Re: 250 cubits...

Anthony October 28, 2007 04:01PM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 04:15PM

Re: 250 cubits...

MJ Thomas October 28, 2007 05:55PM

Re: 250 cubits...

fmetrol October 28, 2007 06:01PM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

C Wayne Taylor October 26, 2007 05:39PM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

fmetrol October 26, 2007 08:44PM

Re: The Square Roots of Giza: The Base Unit Discovered

Jammer November 01, 2007 01:40PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login