Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 2, 2024, 8:56 am UTC    
August 03, 2007 06:06AM
KB: "One of the many things I have questioned about a KC south shaft aimed at something in particular (i.e. Orion belt stars) is the issue of the change in the position of Orion over a period of time. If we are encouraged to accept the shaft alignment theory, especially with such exact standards, do we also need to admit that the Ancient Egyptians during the Old Kingdom were either ignorant of or unconcerned about the slow but steady change of the location of the belt stars over a long period of time?"


Exact standards??? Its only a question of knowing the angle of incline for the top ends of the shafts to determine what area of the sky they were facing.


The middle star in Orion's belt changed altitude by about 1/10 of a degree from the beginning to the end of Khufu's reign, which is hardly measurable with the simple equipment the AE surveyors had at their disposal, so I doubt they would have noticed any difference during Khufu's reign.


Over a century however, its altitude due south changed by about 1/2 deg., (about the dia. of the full moon) and at its rising, was drifting along the eastern horizon northwards by about the same amount. The rising of Sirius was drifting along the horizon by about 4/10 of a deg every 100 years.

If they had been carefully following the risings of 'hour-stars' for a century before Khufu, then its possible they noticed these changes, but there is little textual evidence from before Khufu's reign, so its impossible to say one way or the other. Its only after hundreds of years when if for example, a new temple was built over the ruins of an old temple, but was still oriented to the same rising or setting star, that a really noticeable difference would be apparent, but even if they did notice, it does not mean they understood precession.


See here for my earlier post on precession and the OCT: [www.hallofmaat.com]



KB: "One one hand we have an enormous effort to construct a tomb that was obviously (and as indicated by later texts) intended to be operational for eternity, but on the other hand we have a shaft that will aim at the supposed target for only a limited period of time. It seems unlikely to me that the designers would knowingly impose a time limt to the function of the so-called 'star shafts'. So do we need to conclude that the designers of Khufu's pyramid were unaware of the long term changes in the sky?"


Maybe.


KB: "This question is in addition to the rather problematic issue of the 'star shafts' being only effective -- assuming they are alignment devices -- for a few minutes of the night or day. This, of course, is contrary to later PT text which calls for the King to have complete freedom to come and go as he pleases."



The PTs have numerous ways the king could ascend to the sky, in fact I lost count of the number of methods of ascension. Its pointless to make hard and fast rules, on what options were available to the king - the royal afterlife beliefs were a complex weave of many threads with many options.


Rather than limiting the king only to certain times when a star / star pattern visibly aligned with a shaft, perhaps the shafts were 'targeting' specific areas of the sky, 'Enclosures / Mansions' - associated with significant stars or star patterns when they reached their highest point in the sky - for example there are references to the 'Enclosure / Mansion of Sah' (eg. CT 469). In the PTs there is one mention of Sah (sAH, 'Orion') that has the O49 'town' det.: "I have gone up on the ladder, with my foot on Sah (sAH, 'Orion' with O49 'town det) and my arm is in elevation. I have grabbed onto Thighs-Forward's rope and my arm has been received at the great place. (Nt 272b)


Another example from the PTs, specifically associates a northern celestial 'enclosure' with the the king: "Pepi is an Imperishable Star, son of the great sky that is in the midst of Selket's enclosure.....Pepi is a star. The Sun's aegis is over this Pepi..... (P 511) We know from later depictions that Selket was in the northern sky near the large distinctive asterism, the Plough / 'Big Dipper' (msxtiw).


The king in his celestial realm, would then 'visit' these 'Enclosures / Mansions' from his 'House of Eternity' at the appropriate season. The king could accompany Sah across the southern sky (P 38, N 9), and as Dual King he also had his place as an Imperishable Star in the 'Marsh / Field of Rest / Offerings' in the northern sky.

CT



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/03/2007 06:17AM by Chris Tedder.
Subject Author Posted

King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 05:16AM

Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 01, 2007 05:33AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 05:54AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 01, 2007 06:28AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 06:54AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Dave L August 01, 2007 08:17AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 08:35AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Dave L August 01, 2007 08:41AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 09:26AM

45.0 degrees.

Dave L August 01, 2007 09:30AM

Re: 45.0 degrees.

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 09:49AM

Re: 45.0 degrees.

Dave L August 01, 2007 10:06AM

Re: 45.0 degrees.

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 10:16AM

Re: 45.0 degrees.

Anthony August 01, 2007 10:24AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Hermione August 01, 2007 08:40AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Dave L August 01, 2007 08:46AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Hermione August 01, 2007 08:47AM

Re: No - The Data Suggests Otherwise

Dave L August 01, 2007 08:48AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

C Wayne Taylor August 01, 2007 11:20AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Jeff van Hout August 01, 2007 05:17PM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 02, 2007 04:46AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Ronald August 02, 2007 01:15AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 02, 2007 04:38AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Ronald August 02, 2007 06:00AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 02, 2007 06:50AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Pete Clarke August 02, 2007 07:48AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 02, 2007 08:07AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Pete Clarke August 02, 2007 08:31AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Dave L August 02, 2007 08:42AM

Re: Robert is quite correct.

Ronald August 02, 2007 04:58PM

Re: Robert is quite incorrect.

Anthony August 07, 2007 02:13PM

Re: Robert is quite incorrect.

Chris Tedder August 07, 2007 03:40PM

Re: Robert is quite incorrect.

Anthony August 07, 2007 06:53PM

You know what?

Anthony August 07, 2007 08:02PM

Re: You know what?

Ritva Kurittu August 08, 2007 02:48AM

Re: You know what?

Chris Tedder August 08, 2007 04:48AM

Re: Robert is quite incorrect.

Jeff van Hout August 07, 2007 03:55PM

Meridian

Anthony August 01, 2007 08:46AM

Re: Meridian

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 09:08AM

Thanks n/t

Anthony August 01, 2007 09:19AM

Re: Meridian

Dave L August 01, 2007 09:19AM

Wrong?

Anthony August 01, 2007 09:37AM

Re: Wrong?

Dave L August 01, 2007 09:47AM

Re: You're wrong to say I'm "Wrong"

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 09:51AM

Re: Wrong?

Anthony August 01, 2007 10:14AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Joe_S August 01, 2007 03:25PM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 01, 2007 07:05PM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 04:34AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 05:30AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 05:45AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 06:13AM

Dave, Scott ...

Hermione August 02, 2007 06:28AM

Re: Dave, Scott ...

Dave L August 02, 2007 06:56AM

Re: Dave, Scott ...

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 08:08AM

Re: Dave, Scott ...

Dave L August 02, 2007 08:11AM

Re: Dave, Scott ...

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 08:18AM

software versions - proper motion

clem ciamarra August 02, 2007 09:51AM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Warwick L Nixon August 02, 2007 10:57AM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 12:46PM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Principia August 02, 2007 02:18PM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 02:41PM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Principia August 02, 2007 08:06PM

Re: software versions - proper motion

clem ciamarra August 03, 2007 10:55AM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Scott Creighton August 03, 2007 11:08AM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Hermione August 03, 2007 11:11AM

Re: software versions - proper motion

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 11:35AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 07:26AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Jeff van Hout August 02, 2007 08:17AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Hermione August 02, 2007 08:25AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 08:37AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 08:48AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 09:02AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 09:16AM

Gentlemen ...

Hermione August 02, 2007 09:22AM

Four sets of data

Dave L August 02, 2007 11:08AM

Re: Four sets of data

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 11:39AM

Re: Four sets of data

Dave L August 03, 2007 07:50AM

Re: Four sets of data

Scott Creighton August 03, 2007 08:08AM

Re: Four sets of data

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 08:32AM

Re: Four sets of data

Hermione August 03, 2007 08:48AM

Re: Four sets of data

Dave L August 03, 2007 09:02AM

Re: Four sets of data

Scott Creighton August 03, 2007 09:29AM

Imaginova Respond

Scott Creighton August 06, 2007 11:30AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 02, 2007 10:48AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Jeff van Hout August 02, 2007 08:43AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 08:39AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Jeff van Hout August 02, 2007 06:19AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 02, 2007 07:45AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 02, 2007 10:35AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 11:10AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 02, 2007 11:21AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 02, 2007 11:22AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Chris Tedder August 02, 2007 04:12PM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Ken B August 03, 2007 03:08AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

poundr17 August 03, 2007 03:38AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Chris Tedder August 03, 2007 06:06AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Morph August 03, 2007 06:35AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 03, 2007 07:52AM

Hypothetical question...

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 08:47AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 03, 2007 09:03AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Dave L August 03, 2007 09:07AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 09:12AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Hermione August 03, 2007 09:14AM

I disagree

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 09:19AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 09:16AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Scott Creighton August 03, 2007 09:21AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 09:28AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Chris Tedder August 03, 2007 09:49AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 09:58AM

Re: King's Chamber Shaft Alignment Question

Chris Tedder August 02, 2007 03:54PM

Which Date? Which Star?

Scott Creighton August 04, 2007 04:22AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Chris Tedder August 04, 2007 05:14AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Scott Creighton August 04, 2007 05:42AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Chris Tedder August 04, 2007 07:21AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Scott Creighton August 04, 2007 07:50AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Chris Tedder August 04, 2007 09:43AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Scott Creighton August 04, 2007 10:08AM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Chris Tedder August 04, 2007 12:08PM

Re: Which Date? Which Star?

Scott Creighton August 04, 2007 12:37PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login