Ahatmose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well since you asked. I would think the fact that
> the ratio of the dimensions (base) of G1 and G2
> (9069 inches for G1 and 8472 inches for G2)
> precisely mirror the ratio between the square root
> of 3 (1.7230508075 and G1 and 9069 inches) and Phi
> (1.618033988 and G2 and 8472 inches) this tells us
> that the square root of 3 was a prime motivator in
> the sizing of G1 (height of G1 = sq rt of 3 / 3
> and times 10,000 equals height of G1 - 5773.50
> inches) while Phi is everywhere within and without
> G2 --- for starters. We will save the fact that
> 1/2 the base of G1 divided into the base of G2
> yields the ratio between the semi major axis of
> Venus and Mercury.
>

Welp, the "semimajor axis" is not actually an accurate measurement. If you took a tape measure and ran out to the end of the tape measure and stood there for a very, very, very long time, you have a good chance of NOT being run over by a planet. In fact, you might not even be within any point where gravity would grab you and pull you down to the planet -- that's the error of measurement.

You'd be close. But not exact.

And I've seen you hunt and reject numbers (measurements) that didn't give you the results you wanted. Yet... those numbers that you rejected MIGHT be correct.

-- Byrd
Moderator, Hall of Ma'at