Ahatmose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well since you asked. I would think the fact that
> the ratio of the dimensions (base) of G1 and G2
> (9069 inches for G1 and 8472 inches for G2)
> precisely mirror the ratio between the square root
> of 3 (1.7230508075 and G1 and 9069 inches) and Phi
> (1.618033988 and G2 and 8472 inches) this tells us
> that the square root of 3 was a prime motivator in
> the sizing of G1 (height of G1 = sq rt of 3 / 3
> and times 10,000 equals height of G1 - 5773.50
> inches) while Phi is everywhere within and without
> G2 --- for starters. W
>
> regards
> db

Thanks for taking the time to recount those again. Yes, I remember now

Inches.....yeah, get rid of those pesky cubits, spans and fingers

1.07046742209?

We will save the fact that
> 1/2 the base of G1 divided into the base of G2
> yields the ratio between the semi major axis of
> Venus and Mercury.

Yes of course that would have been very important for the ancient Egyptians to remember and built two pyramids to record it.