To repeat:

"Re: Draft working paper for comments: Analysis of the ScanPyramids results
Posted by: Principia (IP Logged)
Date: April 6, 2018 05:58AM

I would tend to agree the void *may* be a ghosting of sorts, but only if the reading was from one angle. However, the void was confirmed from three directions, the purpose of which was to make sure things like 'ghosting' were reviewed and, subsequently, dismissed. At this juncture - based on multiple directions of muon readings, I tentatively disagree with Dave's proposal.

R. Avry Wilson"

Also, David suggests two lines of sight crisscross through the supposed construction gaps resulting in a ghost image directly above the GG. However, the void was not detected directly above, rather to the west. Your response?