cladking Wrote:
>
> There are two anomalous results. There is the
> thermal anomaly 161' south of the NE corner which
> can only be logically explained by the existence
> of a corridor connecting the colder exterior to a
> warmer interior (in the autumn) and the muon
> results being interpreted as a large possibly
> sloped void above the grand gallery. The former
> can be proven by simply putting the muon
> telescopes at its base at about a 40 degree
> azimuth. The latter can be proven and its
> orientation determined by putting the muon
> telescopes at the exact same place.

What about the other thermal anomaly? Why are you pretending to be an expert in how 'muon telescopes' are placed?
>
> This is the "only" way to see the thermal anomaly
> and unless they want to carry the telescopes up
> the side of the pyramid, it is ideal for viewing
> this new void.

Why?
>
> They have the equipment on site along with
> operators and scientists to use it. It is
> nondestructive testing. It won't cost Dr Hawass
> any money.

You need to get over your obsession with Hawass. Oh, so please tell us who is paying for the salaries of those individuals who have been there for x months?

It will answer all the relevant
> questions to the tiny amount of data they've
> allowed to be published.

As has been explained to you many times it is normal to publish after a project is OVER not when it is only started up and is not complete.
>
> It certainly seems like only fear can tie their
> hands to prevent them doing the science for half a
> century (muon scanning on G1) or a century
> (thermal scanning on a great pyramid).

No its fringe delusion that scientists fear results that might change something but that happens everyday. Now I can give you a good example of fear. You.... what is tying your hands in providing the evidence you have to support your contentions?
>
> I can think of no other reasons in this day and
> age not to do science.

That isn't surprising. You've been given reasons and have rejected them due to your wanting to have something to scream about and deflect attention away from your own failure to produce YOUR results. Where is you data? Where are your conclusions supported by in-depth research and study?

What are YOU afraid of? Being a hypocrite really isn't a good position. "I refuse to publish my material but I'm going to demand others do what I won't', that really doesn't work does it Cladking?

What are you hiding?

Why are you full of fear?

This goes double after
> they get the equipment out there and see it works.
> Remember they still found a void behind the
> "chevrons" whether this larger void exists or not.
> The technology has proven itself.

You said it was already there.""They have the equipment on site along with
> operators and scientists to use it"" so why are you so confused about this?

Tell us if you would - using your extensive personal experience in Egyptian archaeology project planning - how long it takes a project to be planned, funded, personnel selected (who are in your world all sitting around not doing anything else), and to get it all arranged with the Egyptian bureaucracy and the SCA? Show us a time line please.

If you cannot tell us why you can't or are you just afraid to do so?

That Hawass
> doesn't like nor can explain any of the results is
> far better reason to remove Hawass than to remove
> the equipment.

You need to obtain a different person to hate in Egyptology. Do you even know who is really heading up the various on going projects?




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/03/2018 09:18AM by Hans.