Ronald Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MJ Thomas Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ronald Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The
> > > 'geometrical peculiarities' we like to
> see in
> > the
> > > pyramids, are nothing but logical
> > consequences
> > > from the planned and precise building of
> a
> > large
> > > geometrical body. The 'peculiarities'
> were
> > not
> > > intentional.
> >
> > Hello Ronald,
> >
> > Have you any suggestions as to how we go
> about
> > separating the planned/intentional from the
> > "geometrical peculiarities"?
> >
> > How do we tell which is which?
>
>
> MJ,
>
>
> Good question, of course. But don't YOu think it
> is most improbable that the AE intentionally
> wanted to 'build-in' such 'identical ratio's' ?
> How do we make the distinction ? As I see it, the
> most geometrical extrapolations WE LIKE TO MAKE
> from the Giza-piramids, were not intended by the
> AE (WHY should they have been ?) ; they were not
> necessary for the pharaoh to revivicate, they do
> not fit into the frame of the REAL AE culture.

So you would completely rule out numbers, arithmetic, geometry and measurement from any aid to revivification. We have already seen how Khufu summoned up the magic of Thoth. Khufu climbed the rungs of the ladder and I doubt very much if our idea of what constitutes a ladder has much bearing on the case. The framework of AE culture you cling to is hazy by any standard.