Don Barone Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
> The one by two by square root of 5 triangle was
> around a very long time Ronald. Well before the
> straw your clutching at to try and disprove my
> theory came into existence. Although I can hardly
> call it a theory any longer when it fits the facts
> so well now can I.


What 'facts' ? Your computer drawings ???


There is no need to draw The
> Star of David on this plan


So, why did you do it then ? To again ab(use) Giza for your geometrical games ?



to show that the
> overall floorpaln at Giza has been found.


Has been found ? In Ancient Egyptian culture or in your mind ?



> I simply posted that last post to show the error
> of your blantantly false post which stated the
> star orignated in The Middle Ages.



My error is irrelevant.

What IS relevant is that your own correction, namely that the Star of David was first used in approx. the 6th century BC, actually once again confirms the error in your theory. The gap between AE 4th Dynasty, approx. 2575 to 2467 BC, and the 6th century BC remains to wide to bridge this two periods, to give you the right to apply David's Star onto Giza.


As long as you cannot match 'the overall Giza-floorplan' with the caractheristics of Ancient Egyptian culture, your claims will remain worthless and will remain emphasizing your incompetence to correctly evaluate Ancient Egypt.


Ronald.









Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/25/2007 05:35PM by Ronald.