Speaking of facts. ...

It would seem to be a fact that Pyramid 2 is in the relative position to the other two and the radius I propose in the ratio of The Golden Mean.

Now since it has been proven trigonomicly and geometrically and by simply plotting it and drawing the lines and viewing it, it would seem to be exact and all designed around Phi. This of course fits in nicely with the "Golden Angle" which Pyramid 1 is on.

Now it won't take a statistical genius to know that the odds of any thre random points giving us this configuration is, well in the spirit of our discussions here and the Orion Theory, astronomical.

Yes Anthony those pesky facts can work against you as well.

So maybe I will simply call your facts ... dare I say it ... co-incidences ! There I have said and do feel the better for it.

Now look at this image Anthony and try to see it and try to finally understand.



And actually I think Pyramid 2 may be in the Phi position in any major line drawn in this diagram. It is for all intents and purposes a true and all encompassing Phi Point.

Co-incidence Anthony ? I don't think so. Can a fact be a co-incidence ? well maybe but then what keeps your facts out of that realm ?

Don Barone



"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/23/2007 08:06AM by Ahatmose.