cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
>
> It would be extremely interesting to see this
> disproven. All that has to be done is find a
> stone from the pyramid with an identical match in
> the quarry. Just attempting such a thing (even
> though it's supremely easy to do), might yield a
> great deal of information. The bottom of the
> pyramid should primarily be stuff from the top of
> the quarry so there's even little climbing
> involved. The quarry should be in near mint
> condition after the top few yards if it was filled
> with rubble and ramp waste as is apparent.


Brilliant!

You've just proven two arguments at once for me!

1. I have been arguing that the plug stones in the Queen's Chamber shafts should NOT be damaged by drilling because they have the original quarry marks on them, demonstrating the clear use of adzes to shape the limestone. The adze marks are unmistakable.

2. If they had geopolymer available, why would they make the plugstones out of quarried limestone, rather than using "concrete blocks" for them?????


BRILLIANT!

Thank you, CK, for asking your question at exactly the right time!

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.