Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 3:44 am UTC    
RLH
August 04, 2007 11:47AM
Hello Chris

The point I was making is they must have been using a predetermined angle because line of sight would not be possible.

I can see they might have the ability to measure and record a star angle but that does mean they used line of sight when constructing the GP shafts only that they were using a predetermined angle.

The predetermined angle is up for interpretation and it could be to point at stars but then maybe not. It’s the line of sight when constructing the shafts idea that is creating the problem.

CT > Its possible that as they approached the last 10 - 15m, they temporarily left out some blocks to enable the masons to check the angle of the shaft with a final sighting to the relevant star / asterism.

But does that not go back to the idea that each level was put down one at a time?

How did they go back and fill in a level and what is keeping the stones above the (temporary left out) stone from sliding down to the missing space?

RLH
Subject Author Posted

Air-Shafts

RLH August 03, 2007 07:51PM

Re: Air-Shafts

Chris Tedder August 04, 2007 07:43AM

Re: Air-Shafts

RLH August 04, 2007 11:47AM

Re: Air-Shafts

Chris Tedder August 04, 2007 03:45PM

Re: Air-Shafts

Ronald August 05, 2007 02:45AM

Re: Air-Shafts

RLH August 05, 2007 05:18PM

Re: Air-Shafts

Anthony August 05, 2007 08:28PM

Re: Air-Shafts

Chris Tedder August 06, 2007 11:25AM

Internal contradictions

Anthony August 06, 2007 11:31AM

Re: Internal contradictions

Chris Tedder August 06, 2007 01:46PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login