Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 6:11 am UTC    
June 28, 2007 12:39PM
Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Byrd:
>
...
>
> Thought you would like that piece of info; it’s
> quoted from the "identical" source you used, but
> neglected to mention...Wikipedia.



She did not neglect to mention it. She provided the link in its entirety, and it automatically spelled out "en.wikipedia.org" when she did so:

Quote

And prior to 1967, it was:
"the fraction 1/31,556,925.9747 of the tropical year for 1900 January 0 at 12 hours ephemeris time."
[en.wikipedia.org]

At this time, Byrd has not edited her post to add this, so it was there when you read it.

You owe Byrd an apology, I think.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/28/2007 12:54PM by Anthony.
Subject Author Posted

splitting the second of time

Clive June 27, 2007 09:38PM

Re: splitting the second of time

Don Barone June 27, 2007 09:56PM

Re: splitting the second of time

Ronald June 28, 2007 01:59AM

Re: splitting the second of time

Clive June 28, 2007 03:47AM

Re: splitting the second of time

Byrd June 28, 2007 08:46AM

Re: splitting the second of time

Clive June 28, 2007 09:57AM

False accusation

Anthony June 28, 2007 12:39PM

Re: splitting the second of time

lobo-hotei June 28, 2007 02:22PM

Re: splitting the second of time

Clive June 28, 2007 02:37PM

Re: splitting the second of time

lobo-hotei June 28, 2007 02:52PM

Re: splitting the second of time

Clive June 29, 2007 09:57AM

Re: splitting the second of time

lobo-hotei June 29, 2007 02:33PM

Re: splitting the second of time

Byrd July 10, 2007 08:08AM

Re: splitting the second of time

Clive July 16, 2007 09:22PM

Re: splitting the second of time

Clive June 28, 2007 02:01PM

Mod Note

lobo-hotei June 28, 2007 02:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login