wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hello, in this case, it is an intelligence design
> by man...duh!

Fair enough

>
> Well, I would say that it was that easy!

since in the past you've picked me up on spelling/mistyping issues thought I would return the favour now! I think you meant "wouldn't". Still the respect in which I meant it was easy is this. Surely our level of technology and understanding of science is still at a very primitive level. Therefore... if we can do it now... in the grand scheme of things... it can't be too difficult (though obviously it stretches our level of science at the moment).

> Not necessarily! I am not sure that it is in
> someone's best interest to design super mice!!!
>

why? Are you trying to second guess god?

> > I see this as evidence against intelligent
> design.
>
> but of course you would!

OK why would I? I believe in God. I'm a Christian.

I just believe in a God capable of laying down the laws of physics at the big bang and knowing perfectly what would happen with time, instead of a duplicitous one who leaves dino bones pretending that things are over 6000 years, then has to get directly involved in creation AGAIN to fudge things natural biological diversity over the planet.

Go on, why would I?

>
> Maybe one of the super mice 'couples' will escape
> now into the wild and will then become the next
> super species...
>
> --wirelessguru1

No sadly that isn't what would happen. They would likely just out breed and out survive the 'normal' mice population, and eventually decimate them, in much the same way that the grey squirrel is displacing the red squirrel in most of the UK.