No I'm afraid you've still got it wrong! Flying Spaghetti Monsterism is not an evolution based subject, but an intelligent design subject.

Maybe its just making you uncomfortable!

Can I ask you a serious question though! If you put so much down to 'God did it', how do you know where really science stops and the 'God' effect begins? Doesn't it worry you that maybe scientists are going to miss loads of breakthroughs because they see gaps in the current understanding and said 'ahhh thats where God worked his magic' instead of 'Now why does this gap in our understanding occur?' and exploring it.

Also would it be such a wrench to say the bible is wrong? Its allegory! As long as the moral behind it is good it doesn't mean the story itself it true.

I constantly try and see things from your point of view. That doesn't mean I agree with it, just that I can see where you are coming from. Now you try that with me! See that science, evolution, big bang theory etc don't stand in the way of God. They compliment Him. Personally I would have less respect for a god who made the universe and moulded and modelled and took a hand in everything, than a God who set the laws of physics down and sat back KNOWING how things would turn out with having to take other action like switching the odd gene in a creatures make-up. Now THATS omnipotence and omniscience.

I don't understand why such Christian fundamentalists, as you appear to be, feel so threatened that they have to cast down science and try and force it to fit their beliefs. Now you definitely AREN'T going to agree with my next statement, and maybe you're even going to cast me into flames for it, but I really don't care. As a Freemason, in the second degree, we are told to explore the hidden mysteries of science and nature, leading up to the thrown of God. Why is it a problem to explore the universe without assuming God did everything directly? Science, particularly evolution, has taught us so much about the world and ecology we live in. Without the theory of evolution we'd have less medicines, more disease and many more problems. Why? Why is this a problem?

No doubt you'll site some small area where evolution hasn't produced the answer. But just because we haven't found the answer yet doesn't mean we should stop looking. We have overwhelming evidence of the evolution of countless species, and I hear so often 'oh well this one example prooves its all wrong'. Maybe stopping at that level it might, but isn't it better to say. 'Well we have three thousand examples which show this is the way things happen, what has made this one different' without just blaming God (the poor being gets blamed for enough why pile more at its door).

The error you make is that evolution isn't the end answer. Its the toolkit and the framework to find the answer.

But don't worry! I don't expect a real answer from you!

Is that straw I can smell burning?