> Just illustrate that you do not understand what the logical fallacy is-- hint--
> it has nothing do with "transitional states" it has to do with the logic of the
> statement.

I overstand it!!!

Your "false dilemma" assumption, also known as fallacy of the excluded middle or false dichotomy, either/or dilemma or bifurcation, is to set up two alternative points of view as if they were the only options, when they are not, requires a certain dualistic reference that does not match mine...

My reference fully acknowledges all transition energy states and therefore, my statement was not dualistic in nature, which, of course, discredits your logic fallacy assumptions!

But, if you also think that energy stability of the day/year cycle is completely arbitrary and/or random and does not follow some harmonic resonance, please show us some evidence of this randomness since the evidence that I see shows us that these cycles repeat themselves in a stable manner!