> I find it quite revealing that all wirelessguru1 can do post the same
> old trite and cliche one/ two-liners about uniformitarianism being
> junk science and anyone, who dare question his wisdom, as being either
> "funny", "hillarious", and so forth.

I am glad that you find it "quite revealing". That still doesn't change a thing...

> I get the feeling that wirelessguru1
> does not know enough of what he talking to do nothing more but ridicule
> everything and everybody he disagrees with as being "junk", "funny",
> "hillarious" (sic), and so forth.

Well, I really do "wonder" where does that "feeling" come from?

Either case, I am not asking you to agree with me and, if I don't agree with
someone else, I do not "ridicule" him or her! Either case, I still find it
very "funny" the orthodox positions in most subjects...Maybe I find it funny due
to its lack of flexibility and rigid positions!!!

> If wirelessguru1 can explain to me why what I said is "funny" and
> "hillarious" (sic), I can make a new
> career as a standup comedian on PBS. :-) :-) I can just see it now:
> "Why did the trilobite cross the shelf edge?"

See above...

> >In terms of "inventing" catastrophes, I have no
> >idea what you are talking about or where you even
> >got such an idea!
>
> I got this idea from the fact that you almost never explain why a specific
> event, which you claim to be a omen of "Significant Earth and climate"
> changes, is regarded by you to be an indicator of such.

They are not "omens" they are real evidence of Earth changes...

> For example, I would love to know how the development of sinkhole under
> a lake in Russia is related to your upcoming "Significant Earth and climate
> change".

..again, it is evidence of Earth changes. They are not upcoming, they are real happening!

> That you constantly cry, like Chicken Little, "Earth and climate changes
> are starting", "Earth and climate changes are starting" "Earth and climate
> changes are starting" and so forth, without any specific explanation why
> a specific event indicates an upcoming "Earth and climate changes" makes
> me believe you have a very vivid imagination.

Well, I think that you must have a "vivid imagination" inferring all of this chicken little things from my posts! The fact that higher intensity Earth changes are starting and Earth climate changes are already upon us now is not an imagination but rather a reality...

> In case of man-made global warming, I would agree with you. However, you
> need to explain to me and other people in detail how the numerous examples
> of geologic and climatic events are connected an "Earth and climate change"
> if you want to be taken seriously.

Look, I am not asking you to take me seriously if you don't want to and I am not here to change your mind or to make you "believe" in something else outside of what you already believe in. So, if you want to continue to think and/or beleive that the world is flat, be my guest!!!

> However, acting like Chicken Little by repeating again, again, again, again, and
> so on without any explanation that the Earth changes are coming, Earth changes are
> coming, Earth changes are coming, and so on makes me suspect you talking about an
> imaginary Earth changes / catastrophe for which you lack a single shred of evidence.

I don't know, but it seems to me that you have a problem with chickens!

Nevertheless, the changes are already here and the evidence is basically all of the various events that continue to take place throughout the world. These are basically normal everyday events as far as action-reaction is concerned, but there is just an higher frequency and intensity of them...

Like (1) the volcano in Mexico, the intensity of its last eruption was the highest in 20+ years. (2) The rainfall in Southern California this year was the largest ever recorded, (3) the plants and flowers blooming in death valley this spring, not seen in a very long, long time, etc, etc, etc...

> > "They are, of course, not yet of biblical
> > proportions, but based on the fact that
> > everything is cyclical and not linear,
> > there should be no surprise if/when these
> > on-going changes become even more intense..."
>
> Actually Earth history is both cyclical and directional. But that is another post.

Having direction on any cycle is a very clear concept, so what's your point?
Maybe you have more of those "chicken little" statements, so please share them with the rest of us...

-+wirelessguru1