I am sorry to say but they are very much related! It has EVERYTHING to do with his linear thinking and 3rd party intervention!!!

For global warming, or whatever it is the correct term to use or to call (I prefer global Earth changes!) to what we are observing and measuring, to OBEY the Darwinian evolution rules that Dave and I were discussing before, no 3rd party intervention is EVER allowed!

Essentially, he cannot have both ways, sorry...

Once he assumes 3rd party intervention today, then it immediately suggests that 3rd party intervention could have also have done many time before...

Again, he cannot have it both ways...

I was commenting on the consistency and the logic of his thinking! Note however that if or when one assumes 3rd party intervention then by all means, 3rd party intervention is and MUST be necessary to intervene on global warming and/or any other so called natural processes. This an essential aspect of my argument...

You are suggesting that one should separate both topics like somehow they are isolated! IMHO that is not how nature works since all things are related...Humans are not above nature...

eom