wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Look Dave, water by definition retains energy!
No, that is not part of the definition of water. Whereas it does have a reasonably high specific heat capacity, it only retains that energy if it is not warmer than its surroundings.
[...]
> example, the entire United Kingdom and Ireland
> would probably be frozen without the warm waters
> of the gulf stream...
Rubbish. There is no reason for the British Isles to be colder than any other place of the same latitude. Your statement is also entirely at odds with your ridiculous claim that water retains energy: if it did then,
by definition, it could not lose that energy to warm the British Isles.
>to exclusively blame
> greenhouse gases as the main factor in these
> global Earth changes is what is naive at best!
Straw Man argument. Nobody is exclusively blaming greenhouse gases. The argument is not about whether or not greenhouse gases are contributory, but about the
extent to which they are contributory.
>
> For example, it is very much possible that our
> solar system could be entering a much more
> energetic area/place in space as part of a large
> macro cycle!
PLease (a) describe what you mean and (b) provide evidence for it.
> As a matter of fact, many of the new
> electro-magnetic (EM) Universe theories do suggest
> exactly that
PLease cite refereed sources for that claim.
--
Stephen
