Warwick L Nixon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Not following. Are you saying every person who
> doesn't believe in GW is contributing to GW?? "
>
> lets try a different approach ( the dabate over
> the actual existence of GW notwithstanding)
>
>
> Noe of teh supposed Causes of GW are good for the
> environment even if prooved to not be contributing
> to GW ( if it is indeed a valid refenced)
***
Agreed. Nothing mankind does with respect to any ARTIFICIAL means/process/objects is "good" for the environment.
>
> so what is the harm in reduceing emissions, waste,
> genetic anarchy,chmical insertions into food, etc
> etc etc?
***
Nothing whatsoever. But, if we choose to do that at such great expense that half the planet dies of starvation, we might want to prioritize a letter better.
>
> Instead of arguing of what the effects of all this
> crap is. why don't we simply try and control the
> crap and worry about what we have
> savedourselvesfrom afterwards??
***
Agreed. [Political comments removed]
>
> If we wait for difinitive answers it may be too
> late
***
It will never be too late. Did you know that we've had fewer-than-"normal" volcanic eruptions in the last few centuries? One krakatoa and we'll rewind GW a decade or more. Cold = painful = bad. Heat = discomfort = good.
Warmth is what allowed humanity to thrive.
JL
>
>
>
> Warwick
>
> Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off
> until next week
Shephard of Hermas - 2[79]:2 Now this rock was ancient, and had a gate hewn out of it; but the gate seemed to me to have been hewed out quite recently. And the gate glistened beyond the brightness of the sun, so that I marvelled at the brightness of the gate.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/28/2005 12:34PM by DougWeller.