Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 8, 2024, 7:17 pm UTC    
May 29, 2005 11:14AM
Dave L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What date?

It was Bronze Age - 3rd millennium-ish.

>
> As for Thom's son, if he has evidence, fine, but
> his dad certainly didn't.

[Thom, A.S. & Merritt, R.L., "Some Stone Rings in Scandinavia", Archaeological Journal, 140 (1983), 109-119. Both the Thoms, and Merritt, are all now dead, regrettably.] Well, as far as I can judge, Archibald Thom seems to have applied the same sort of techniques to Scandinavia as his father did to Britain and France. So, if you were to get hold of the paper and analyze its findings, it's possible that you might come up with conclusions similar to your findings on the work of Alexander Thom.

However, the people who erected the stone henges and other megalithic monuments must have had some sort of measuring system: although the general argument, AFAIK, is that the surveyors were just using the human pace, which is about the size of the Megalithic Yard; presumably, then, the argument is that the apparent variations in the size of the Megalithic Yard are nothing more nor less than the normal variations in the extent of the human pace. But one of your objections is that Thom's Megalithic Yard might vary in length as much as 1.26 feet ... Whilst it might be supposed that most grown people’s paces might vary by a few inches, would they really vary by as much as 15 inches … ?? Again, if Archibald Thom’s Scandinavian Quantum of 4.71 feet were found to be valid, what relationship might that have with the human pace?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at


Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me
Subject Author Posted

Who said, RE Metrology?

Dave L May 26, 2005 02:52PM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Hermione May 26, 2005 03:45PM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Dave L May 26, 2005 04:28PM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Hermione May 27, 2005 05:04AM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Dave L May 27, 2005 10:34AM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Hermione May 27, 2005 12:34PM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Dave L May 27, 2005 03:26PM

Re: Who said, RE Metrology?

Hermione May 28, 2005 11:09AM

Interesting....

Dave L May 28, 2005 01:49PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall May 28, 2005 02:10PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 28, 2005 03:20PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall May 28, 2005 03:23PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 28, 2005 03:28PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall May 28, 2005 03:32PM

Gentlemen...

Katherine Reece May 28, 2005 03:35PM

Re: Gentlemen...

John Wall May 28, 2005 03:37PM

Re: Gentlemen...

Katherine Reece May 28, 2005 03:39PM

Re: Gentlemen...

John Wall May 28, 2005 03:42PM

Re: Gentlemen...

Dave L May 28, 2005 05:00PM

Re: Interesting....

Doug Weller May 28, 2005 02:17PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 28, 2005 03:23PM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione May 28, 2005 03:05PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 28, 2005 03:24PM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione May 29, 2005 11:14AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 31, 2005 07:15AM

Re: Interesting....

Doug Weller May 31, 2005 07:18AM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione May 31, 2005 08:46AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 31, 2005 05:28PM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione May 31, 2005 08:25AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L May 31, 2005 05:27PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 09:43AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 09:57AM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 01, 2005 10:01AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 10:35AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 11:13AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 11:31AM

Re: Interesting....

Katherine Reece June 01, 2005 11:33AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 11:43AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 11:53AM

Re: Interesting....

Katherine Reece June 01, 2005 12:01PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 10:34AM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 10:52AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 11:10AM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 12:04PM

Re: Interesting....

Katherine Reece June 01, 2005 12:08PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 12:15PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 01, 2005 03:07PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 03:32PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 01, 2005 04:15PM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 04:22PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 01, 2005 03:06PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 12:11PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 01:00PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 01:25PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 01:38PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 01:51PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 02:08PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 02:19PM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione June 01, 2005 12:12PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 12:16PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 12:41PM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 12:44PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 01:02PM

Re: Interesting....

Katherine Reece June 01, 2005 01:05PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 01:13PM

see Kat

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 01:27PM

Re: see Kat

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 01:41PM

Re: see Kat

Warwick L Nixon June 01, 2005 01:54PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 01:11PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 01:40PM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione June 01, 2005 02:34PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 04:27PM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 04:39PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 04:47PM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 05:04PM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 05:15PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 01, 2005 05:24PM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 05:39PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 07:00PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 01, 2005 07:04PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 01, 2005 07:18PM

Re: Interesting....

lobo-hotei June 01, 2005 07:25PM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 02, 2005 03:04AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 02, 2005 07:31AM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 02, 2005 07:48AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 02, 2005 08:00AM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 02, 2005 08:06AM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 02, 2005 08:12AM

Moderator's Note

Doug Weller June 02, 2005 08:14AM

Re: Interesting....

John Wall June 02, 2005 08:01AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 08:07PM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 08:35PM

Re: Interesting....

Dave L June 02, 2005 07:30AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 02, 2005 08:47AM

Re: Interesting....

Hermione June 02, 2005 09:12AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 02, 2005 10:06AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 02, 2005 11:24AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 11:31AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 02, 2005 11:36AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 11:39AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 02, 2005 11:44AM

Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

teacup June 02, 2005 09:35AM

Re: Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 09:55AM

Re: Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

Hermione June 02, 2005 10:00AM

Re: Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

teacup June 02, 2005 10:11AM

Re: Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 10:35AM

Re: Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

teacup June 02, 2005 10:41AM

Re: Humor Alert ... Humor Alert !!

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 11:12AM

DaveL ...

Hermione June 02, 2005 11:00AM

Hermione

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 11:14AM

Hermione

Dave L June 02, 2005 11:38AM

Re: Interesting....

Warwick L Nixon June 02, 2005 09:47AM

Re: Interesting....

goaten June 01, 2005 03:59PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.