Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 22, 2024, 11:35 am UTC    
October 09, 2001 10:10PM
<HTML>Allright then.

Try this.

Let's say there are no shafts in any of the three. Let's imagine there never were any. Now. Looking at the sides of the pyramids, which four directions are each set perpendicular to?

North, South, East, and West. If you disagree at this point, you are seriously out to lunch. Next...

We have the layout of the three pyramids of Giza, and their configuration most certainly does resemble the same pattern as Orion's Belt. Upsidedown, sideways, whatever - the 3 of one and three of the other are in the same pattern. If you disagree with this point, then we know your only purpose is to cause trouble and not be honest about very simple, obvious concepts. I'm sorry if that's 'insulting', but there's really nothing to this. Next...

We have the scenario I proposed above: Face South. Draw the Belt. Lay it down. Giza. When done, the pattern on the ground now mimics perfectly the pattern in the sky by orientation. Plus... the Nile is to your left (since you're facing South) and the Milky Way is to the left of Orion. If you don't understand this, get off your haunch and go do it. It's really easy to test. Go outside. Do you know what Orion looks like and where it is? Good! (If not, don't worry, just ask around... someone knows - it's just that famous of a grouping...). Now, when it reaches, say, the halfway point of it's traverse, draw what you see. Easy, hunh? Now, when you've done, lay it down. What do you see? Well well well. Go figure - Giza.

Now, does anyone disagree that the Nile is not to the left of Giza when facing South? Does anyone disagree that the Milky Way is to the left of Orion in the Southern sky? Does anyone disagree that if you face south, draw Orion, and lay it down in front of you it is the same pattern? Take your time before deciding. I dunno. It looks really really simple to me. (In fact I've shown it to children, and they get it.)

When alll this is done, stop for a second. Was any of this done with shafts? NO, dammit. *lol*

After they'd decided what it was all going to look like in the layout sense, THEN they added in some shafts to the design in order to 'point' to there favorite stars or parts of the sky. Now, people, even Krupp knows that the NORTHERN shaft points at the NORTH star. And every Egyptologist KNOWS that the AE's had some freaky-deaky deified love affair with the stars in the north polar region. "The Imperishable Ones" they called them. Anyone know why? Because they don't set. Yup. It doesn't matter what UP or DOWN is - all they knew was that 'in that direction there are stars that don't set'. So they pointed something at the most important one - the one in the middle of them all. And the South shaft? Well, it happens to point at the CORRESPONDING star (Al Nitak) of the GP in the Belt stars as they cross the meridian. The date which it points to is where all the huff is about!

But so what? The date means nothing (it isn't necessary to create a layout of three pyramids the same way a group of three stars is in the sky). Neither do the shafts, really. So, if there are no shafts, I could say the exact same thing to Krupp:

Face south. Draw the Belt. Lay it down. Giza.

And guess what? Now how does he put it up-side-down? (His argument doesn't work WITH the shafts, and now he's supposed to make a case with them?)

I wonder...

How does this man's brain work?

Chris Hale: I'd love to do give you an hour of my time to do a show with the entire hour dedicated to presenting this. With visuals, I can make it even simpler. We'll talk. (sip)

R. Avry Wilson

_____________


Mr Brass: You think Orion is in the North, huhn? Way to kick my ass on that one. *lol*</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Invitation for Correction

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 09:25AM

My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 10:08AM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Chris Hale October 09, 2001 12:22PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 12:42PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 01:12PM

Hey, Chris

Anthony October 09, 2001 01:19PM

Excellent Post

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 01:36PM

Magnetic North

Anthony October 09, 2001 02:01PM

Re: Magnetic North

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 02:21PM

Re: Magnetic North

Anthony October 09, 2001 02:25PM

THE REAL POINT PLEASE?

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 06:11AM

Re: THE REAL POINT PLEASE?

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 07:45AM

Re: Hey, Chris

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 02:22AM

Thanks Chris.

Derek Barnett October 09, 2001 03:14PM

Derek???

Anthony October 09, 2001 03:20PM

Anthony???

Derek Barnett October 09, 2001 03:30PM

Re: Anthony???

Anonymous User October 09, 2001 03:38PM

Re: Anthony???

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 07:19PM

Re: Anthony???

Anthony October 09, 2001 07:23PM

Re: Anthony???

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 07:24AM

Re: Anthony???

John October 09, 2001 03:53PM

Re: Anthony???

Stephen Tonkin October 09, 2001 11:14PM

Re: Anthony???

lone October 10, 2001 04:27AM

Re: Anthony???

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 07:50AM

Re: Anthony???

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 07:56AM

Re: Anthony???

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:13AM

Re: Anthony???

Anthony October 10, 2001 08:15AM

Re: Anthony???

Claire October 10, 2001 08:31AM

Re: Anthony???

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:33AM

Hey Duncan!

Claire October 10, 2001 08:40AM

Re: Hey Claire!

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:47AM

Re: Anthony???

lone October 10, 2001 12:45PM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Claire October 09, 2001 04:14PM

Cardinal Point Alignment

Anthony October 09, 2001 05:22PM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Mikey Brass October 09, 2001 05:37PM

Mikey

Anthony October 09, 2001 06:36PM

Re: Hieroglyph for North

Greg Reeder October 09, 2001 07:59PM

Re: Hieroglyph for North

Anthony October 09, 2001 08:41PM

Re: Hieroglyph for North

Greg Reeder October 09, 2001 10:20PM

Re: Hieroglyph for North

Anthony October 10, 2001 06:22AM

Re: Hieroglyph for North

Claire October 10, 2001 09:02AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 02:28AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Claire October 10, 2001 04:38AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 04:49AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Anthony October 10, 2001 06:31AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 07:52AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 08:04AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:20AM

Alignment

Anthony October 10, 2001 08:23AM

Re: Thanks Chris.

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 08:01AM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Don Holeman October 09, 2001 06:49PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 12:17AM

Deeply rooted prejudice

Anthony October 10, 2001 07:00AM

Re: Deeply rooted prejudice

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:06AM

Re: Deeply rooted prejudice

Anthony October 10, 2001 08:12AM

Re: Deeply rooted prejudice

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 01:39PM

Re: Deeply rooted prejudice

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 01:23PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 08:11AM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:28AM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 12:52PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Mikey Brass October 09, 2001 05:32PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 07:26PM

Repeating and getting it

lone October 09, 2001 08:43PM

Re: Repeating and getting it

Anthony October 09, 2001 09:00PM

Re: My Reasons for Not Accepting Krupp's Argument

Greg Reeder October 09, 2001 08:08PM

Invitation accepted.

Anthony October 09, 2001 11:57AM

Re: Invitation accepted.

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 12:42PM

To Mr Hale

R. Avry Wilson October 09, 2001 01:12PM

Re: To Mr Hale

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 01:25PM

Re: To Mr Hale

Robert G. Bauval October 09, 2001 05:49PM

Coming Out Party

Anthony October 09, 2001 07:14PM

Well Said!

ISHMAEL October 09, 2001 07:29PM

Re: Well Said!

Anthony October 09, 2001 07:54PM

Re: To Mr Hale

Stephen Tonkin October 09, 2001 11:45PM

Re: To Mr Hale (slight addition -- or is it the correcting of a slight [g])

Stephen Tonkin October 09, 2001 11:56PM

Re: To Mr Hale

Robert G. Bauval October 10, 2001 01:44AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 02:30AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Robert G. Bauval October 10, 2001 06:16AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 06:32AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 05:29PM

Re: To Mr Hale

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 08:18AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 08:46AM

Re: To Mr Hale

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 10:44AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 12:51PM

Re: To Mr Hale

Derek Barnett October 10, 2001 01:06PM

Re: To Mr Hale

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 02:07AM

He's back!

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 04:53AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 06:34AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 02:24AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Robert G. Bauval October 10, 2001 06:18AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Anonymous User October 10, 2001 07:13AM

Re: To Mr Hale

Stephen Tonkin October 10, 2001 01:12PM

For those who still don't get it

R. Avry Wilson October 09, 2001 10:10PM

Re: For those who still don't get it

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 06:19AM

Throwing out evidence

Anthony October 10, 2001 06:48AM

Re: Throwing out evidence

Chris Hale October 10, 2001 10:43AM

Re: Throwing out evidence

ISHMAEL October 10, 2001 10:47AM

Re: Throwing out evidence

Mikey Brass October 10, 2001 03:30PM

typo n/t

R. Avry Wilson October 09, 2001 10:15PM

Re: typo n/t

al-Urman October 10, 2001 12:25PM

Chris Hale, and everyone, listen

R. Avry Wilson October 11, 2001 12:16AM

I told you so. n/t

Don Holeman October 11, 2001 12:25AM

Re: Chris Hale, and everyone, listen

Chris Hale October 11, 2001 03:06AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login