<HTML>Sandy wrote:
"I've never seen such petty behavior as Anthony's. None of this is going to help your reputation Anthony. "
My reputation is really none of your concern, Sandy.
The answers to these questions should be your only concerns, right now.
Since you have been the one to BRING UP the geopolymer theory, I believe you have the responsibility to defend it -- or NOT or withdraw your support.
Now, either you do not HAVE the answers, or the answers do not EXIST.
I am far more inclined to believe that the first option is a RESULT of the second option, but the world is waiting for YOU, the supporter of the geopolymer theory, to come up with a simple answer to the simple questions.
Come on, Sandy...
Is it SO hard to say that there IS no evidence of geopolymer "oozing" down between two blocks?
Is it SO hard to say that you don't know WHY they would use two different kinds of packable artificial stone simultaneously on the same project? (and one of them being of a SEVERELY lower quality? And being of a standard ancient, established mortar technology?)
If I wanted to be rude, I'd say something akin to "Put up or shut up." However, I'm really NOT a rude person. Your behaviour has been exasperating... and my language has been strong... but I believe you will find that there is NOTHING I have said that can not be backed up by research or documented fact.
So... Sandy...
the CORRECT answer is......?
Anthony</HTML>
