Re: Relation to OCT

Home

Discussion Forums

Papers

Authors

Web Links

May 22, 2024, 5:22 pm UTC

In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic

Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In

Ancient History • Ancient Egypt • Laboratory • Humanities • Apocalypse • Paper Lens • Coffee Shop
Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology

sandy

October 01, 2001 05:08AM

<HTML>If topography were the controling factor in the change of direction of this causeway, then the AE would have been better to have built the causeway in a southeasterly direction, where the terrain is less steep. Afteral there was nothing to stop them doing that, Khufu's was the first(according to orthadoxy). There would have been no other structures in their way at that time, so they could have built that causeway in any direction they chose.

Does terrain/topography have a controlling factor in the 160.68° angle through the north western corner of the pyramids? The same angle that is laid out in Khufu's causeway, and that you maintain is controlled by topography. Or is it just one of the many co-incidental alignments at giza?

How many alignment relationships do you need before it stops being a coincidence? And I'm not talking about star alignments here, purely structural.

Why did the AE see a need to construct the other two main pyramids to have the north west corners angularly reflect the angle in Khufu's causeway? An angle that is precise, far more precise than any stellar alignment.</HTML>

Reply Quote

Subject	Author	Posted
Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 12:28PM
Re: Pyramids for John	John Wall	September 30, 2001 01:23PM
Re: Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 02:31PM
Re: Pyramids for John	John Wall	September 30, 2001 02:36PM
Re: Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 02:42PM
Re: Pyramids for John	John Wall	September 30, 2001 03:33PM
Re: Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 05:02PM
Re: Pyramids for John	John Wall	September 30, 2001 05:47PM
Re: Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 05:54PM
Re: Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 06:00PM
Re: Pyramids for John	sandy	September 30, 2001 03:22PM
Re: Pyramids for John	John Wall	September 30, 2001 03:34PM
Relation to OCT	barry	September 30, 2001 03:58PM
Re: Relation to OCT	John Wall	September 30, 2001 04:33PM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	September 30, 2001 05:06PM
Re: Relation to OCT	John Wall	September 30, 2001 05:34PM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	September 30, 2001 05:39PM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	September 30, 2001 05:49PM
Re: Relation to OCT	John Wall	September 30, 2001 05:55PM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	September 30, 2001 06:09PM
Coincidental Angles	Anthony	September 30, 2001 08:17PM
Re: Coincidental Angles	sandy	September 30, 2001 08:51PM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	September 30, 2001 08:33PM
Re: Relation to OCT	Stephen Tonkin	October 01, 2001 12:34AM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	October 01, 2001 03:33AM
Re: Relation to OCT	sandy	October 01, 2001 05:08AM
Topographics	Anthony	October 01, 2001 07:44AM
Re: Topographics	John Wall	October 01, 2001 07:53AM
Re: Topographics	Anthony	October 01, 2001 04:56PM
Re: Topographics	John Wall	October 02, 2001 09:08AM
Re: Topographics	sandy	October 01, 2001 07:32PM
HELLO??	Katherine Reece	October 01, 2001 09:35PM
HELLO BACK!!	sandy	October 02, 2001 08:00AM
That outcropping.....	Katherine Reece	October 02, 2001 08:33AM
Re: That outcropping.....	sandy	October 02, 2001 08:56AM
Re: That outcropping.....	Katherine Reece	October 02, 2001 09:27AM
Re: That outcropping.....	sandy	October 02, 2001 09:31AM
Re: That outcropping.....	Don Holeman	October 02, 2001 05:26PM
Re: That outcropping.....	sandy	October 02, 2001 07:27PM
Re: That outcropping.....	Katherine Reece	October 03, 2001 08:18AM
Re: HELLO??	sandy	October 02, 2001 08:01AM
Re: Topographics	Anthony	October 02, 2001 10:43AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login