Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 18, 2024, 4:18 am UTC    
September 30, 2001 05:02PM
<HTML>John
I'm going to try and explain what I am showing with that drawing.

The large circle drawn from the centre of Khufu's baseline is snapped to the north eastern corner of Khafre's pyramid. It runs through the Khafre mortuary temple and intersects with the line running east, from the south side of the mortuary temple. There is an overlap on this line of 5.4016 inches over a span of 10306.6507 inches(858.887 feet). So that circle is just over 5 inches over the base line of the mortuary temple. There is a big questionmark here. What are the dimensions of the mortuary temple from pyramid centreline? The mortuary temple measurements I have are from a French Architect, but every dimension I have seen on the web has given a different reading. So does the circle from the GP intersect perfectly with the baseline of Khafre mortuary temple?

The northern edge of the Khafre causeway would meet the interior north western corner of the mortuary temple, if the line were carried on. The northern edge of the causeway is running at a tangent from the circle that is centred on Khufu's baseline. The circle does not overlap the causeway, it just touches the northern edge.

The circle that is centred on Khafre's northeastern corner and is snapped to a line runnung west from Khufu's baseline. Overlaps the Khafre mortuary temple baseline by 12.8486 inches. Again I state that I have no accurate data for the dimensions of that temple other than the drawings of a French Architect.

The two circles centred on the north and southeast corners of Khafre's pyramid, and the one centred at the back edge of the mortuary temple/pyramid centreline, intersect 9.939 feet east of the mortuary temple. That intersection is also 12.64 inches south of an easterly line drawn on the outside of the northern wall of the temple, and 12.64 inches north of an east line from the outside of the south wall. There might well be no significance in those 3 circles, but I just thought I would add them in.

As to the angle of Khufu's causeway being due to a change in terrain. Why should a change in terrain result in a change of angle in the causeway? The causeway is said to have been built up to the level of the plateau, so a change in topography was not a problem, and is unlikely to have resulted in an angle change in the causeway. Is it dismissible that this particular causeway reflects the same angle as the northwestern corners of the 3 pyramids?

Now the question is, if Khufus pyramid and causway were built first, were the two other main pyramids aligned to reflect this causeway angle of 160.68°, or was Khufu's causeway built to reflect the angle of the northwest corners of the 3 pyramids?

That would mean that his causeway was built after the 2 other main giza pyramids, wouldn't it?

Even if you argue that Khufu's causeway does have a change of angle due to topography changes, it does not explain why the north west corners of the pyramids have the same angle. It can not be put down to random chance.</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 12:28PM

Re: Pyramids for John

John Wall September 30, 2001 01:23PM

Re: Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 02:31PM

Re: Pyramids for John

John Wall September 30, 2001 02:36PM

Re: Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 02:42PM

Re: Pyramids for John

John Wall September 30, 2001 03:33PM

Re: Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 05:02PM

Re: Pyramids for John

John Wall September 30, 2001 05:47PM

Re: Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 05:54PM

Re: Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 06:00PM

Re: Pyramids for John

sandy September 30, 2001 03:22PM

Re: Pyramids for John

John Wall September 30, 2001 03:34PM

Relation to OCT

barry September 30, 2001 03:58PM

Re: Relation to OCT

John Wall September 30, 2001 04:33PM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy September 30, 2001 05:06PM

Re: Relation to OCT

John Wall September 30, 2001 05:34PM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy September 30, 2001 05:39PM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy September 30, 2001 05:49PM

Re: Relation to OCT

John Wall September 30, 2001 05:55PM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy September 30, 2001 06:09PM

Coincidental Angles

Anthony September 30, 2001 08:17PM

Re: Coincidental Angles

sandy September 30, 2001 08:51PM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy September 30, 2001 08:33PM

Re: Relation to OCT

Stephen Tonkin October 01, 2001 12:34AM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy October 01, 2001 03:33AM

Re: Relation to OCT

sandy October 01, 2001 05:08AM

Topographics

Anthony October 01, 2001 07:44AM

Re: Topographics

John Wall October 01, 2001 07:53AM

Re: Topographics

Anthony October 01, 2001 04:56PM

Re: Topographics

John Wall October 02, 2001 09:08AM

Re: Topographics

sandy October 01, 2001 07:32PM

HELLO??

Katherine Reece October 01, 2001 09:35PM

HELLO BACK!!

sandy October 02, 2001 08:00AM

That outcropping.....

Katherine Reece October 02, 2001 08:33AM

Re: That outcropping.....

sandy October 02, 2001 08:56AM

Re: That outcropping.....

Katherine Reece October 02, 2001 09:27AM

Re: That outcropping.....

sandy October 02, 2001 09:31AM

Re: That outcropping.....

Don Holeman October 02, 2001 05:26PM

Re: That outcropping.....

sandy October 02, 2001 07:27PM

Re: That outcropping.....

Katherine Reece October 03, 2001 08:18AM

Re: HELLO??

sandy October 02, 2001 08:01AM

Re: Topographics

Anthony October 02, 2001 10:43AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login