<HTML>I've been reading quietly for weeks now, but I just couldn't resist responding to these:
Sandy J. Perkins wrote in one posting in this topic: "What researcher is going to reschedule their work for Anthony's questions? MM said participating at the Blease message board was putting her behind in an important research project and she couldn't afford to continue writing out answers to questions every day. It's too bad but people have to set priorities. I can understand her point on this - I think we all can because we've all had pet projects."
And then Sandy J. Perkins wrote: "There you go again Anthony expecting people to tick on your schedule."
I really, truly LOL'ed! One of the things I took umbrance to in Ms. Morris's writings and at her website on the pages about Chris Dunn and his theory is that she seemed to expect him to drop everything he was doing and attend to her desire to debate him. He didn't respond quickly enough to suit her. When she grew impatient, she admittedly went about being a tactical antagonist to force him to respond according to her timeline.
Is this a case of the pot calling the kettle black? Methinks it is! Sandy J. Perkins wrote, "I can understand her point on this - I think we all can because we've all had pet projects." It's unfortunate that Ms. Morris doesn't share that type of understanding. Maybe then we would have seen a positive, productive and enlightening discussion. (I'm weary of the term debate. It smacks of bickering, and there's already too much of that in the world.)
Okay, I'm going back to my quiet corner now. If answers to Frank's or Anthony's questions appear, somebody nudge me! ;-)</HTML>