<HTML>Margaret Morris tells me she does have email from Anthony. She said she did not answer the last one because of its "tone." I asked her if I could post it for all to see but she does not want to fight on this level. She wants to concentrate on facts and keep everything on the polite level of higher discourse.
Anthony said he got "curt" when she stopped answering his questions. I get the sense that Anthony was demanding immediate answers from her. But what ever the case Anthony had no right to ever get curt with anyone about this theory - getting curt has nothing to do with higher discourse. So much has already been published that there's an amazing amount of information. Behavior such as Anthony and FD display make people not want to participate no matter what they know.
What researcher is going to reschedule their work for Anthony's questions? MM said participating at the Blease message board was putting her behind in an important research project and she couldn't afford to continue writing out answers to questions every day. It's too bad but people have to set priorities. I can understand her point on this - I think we all can because we've all had pet projects.
Now I must ask: Is the Anthony of this message board Anthony Sakovich the originator of the Herodotus Machine theory?
If yes, this might explain his treatment of a competing theory.
And If this is the Herodotus Machine Anthony, I guess Anthony will not like it when Margaret Morris puts up a web page covering the Herodotus quote. MM said she tossed some info together a while back but other work got in the way. She says she since revised her intitial info but had to stop again because of important work. She says she will get back to it as time allows. MM says her web page will not be against Anthony's Herodotus Machine itself or combative because she loves new ideas. She said her page will explain Herototus's passage in a way that opens up interesting avenues of thought relative to geopolymerization.
Finally what you see as faults in their logic Anthony are not. I hope we can get on with these points and so I'm looking forward to Katherine setting some standards. I can't tell her how to run her board but if I conducted a message board I would not allow people to insult professional researchers. It's counter productive to Ma'at and an insult to what Ma'at stands for.
Sandy</HTML>
