<HTML>>no sir - more likely the timely placement
>of a slanderous letter would drive them
>from dealing with me.
Good grief you are paranoid. What c***.
>I heard it through the grapevine that >someone was going to do this exact thing,
Baldedash.
>and also to contact Dr Spence in the hope
>of destroying my chances at even being
>heard.
Kate already knows of your ravings on GHMB; the less said what she thinks of them the better. Kate doesn't this all-encompasing power to prevent articles from being published or from opposing viewpoints being heard - indeed it's an insult to even imply such a thing. On the contrary, Kate has stated on more than one occassion she welcomes criticism of her hypothesis and she welcomed the differing viewpoint put forward by Pickering & Rawlins, which occurred in a friendly & professional manner (Duncan, John and I know - we saw them debating together at a conference in June).
Bye Avry.
Mike.</HTML>