Rick Baudé Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There was only one confirmed Clovis burial.
One more than found in California @ 130,000 years ago.
Why does zero seem to carry as much weight as one here?
> There was only one tooth discovered at Denisova.
Plus a finger bone from a different individual (so you have given the required three counting the Clovis kid, thanks), plus DNA for three, plus stone tools in the same layer. All hard evidence Cerutti doesn't have. If you don't have it Holen et al., just make it up...sells museum tickets though.
> Originally there was only one Coelacanth caught.
Right...
[
www.hallofmaat.com]
"one is an accident; two is a coincidence; three is a pattern -"
> Yep. One is all it takes to overturn a dogma,
Even Holen admitted it will take more than one site @ 130,000 to prove their case. Are you saying they are wrong?
Someone just saw a UFO, guess that overturns a dogma?
Let's see what Cerutti has to date. No hominin burial, no DNA, no hominin finger bone, no hominin tooth, no impacted bone in the alleged hammer stones, just broken bones and post hoc stories about "they" were here. Who is they? Vampires are a better candidate IMO.
