Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 6, 2024, 7:27 am UTC    
Claire
August 29, 2001 08:59AM
<HTML>Hi Ian

For someone so confrontational and quick to insult it is a mistake to be so over-sensitive I should think :-)

>>or
do you disapprove of religion as well?

As well as what? Vandalism? Do the two often go together? I didn't offer any view about religion. I didn't offer any view about anyone hanging out at West Kennet either - the '~lol~' was connected with the - I think they are 'new agers' rather than these UFO guys because I shouldn't think that UFO guys would leave those sorts of offerings. - Do you get it?

If you disapprove of tampering with Silbury Hill for idle curiousity, then I guess you must disapprove of these 'ufologists' as well? Maybe not - consistency isn't your thing? :-)

Claire</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Katherine Reece August 28, 2001 09:27AM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Claire August 28, 2001 11:43AM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Katherine Reece August 28, 2001 11:49AM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Peter VanderZwet August 28, 2001 02:18PM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Archimedes Thistlewaite August 28, 2001 07:25PM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Mattcarps August 29, 2001 03:47AM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

JoeRoyle August 29, 2001 06:50AM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Claire August 29, 2001 08:59AM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Archimedes Thistlewaite August 29, 2001 04:12PM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Claire August 29, 2001 04:33PM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Bryan August 29, 2001 05:57PM

Re: Alien seekers damage Stone Age mound

Duncan August 30, 2001 04:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login