<HTML>Mikey Brass wrote:
>
> Hi Ishmael,
>
> It's obvious that whilst you're listening to our
> archaeological objections your view is that there is more to
> this than meets the eye. The only thing which will persuade
> you one way or the other, ie. whether your viewturns out to
> have astronomical validity or not, is through an examination
> by someone with detailed astronomical knowledge.
>
> So personally, and John may disagree with me here, I feel
> it's time to lay off the archaeological objections and for us
> all to find a way to test your idea astronomically.
>
> That you noted Bauval's proposed correlation is weak
> astronomically says to me that you are willing to evaluate
> all possibilities. Fine, so lets do that. Does anyone else
> here have any further ideas, apart from HASTRO-L which can
> help ?
>
> Mike.
Mike, I'm sort of busy at the minute with my OU stuff, thus I cann't look into this deeper (and I'm not sure I have the required detailed astronomical knowledge), but I suggest you get a hold of Steve Tonkin, who does...
Best Regards,
Dave</HTML>
