Hi Graham ,

> Geometric proof restated in new posting
>
> Khufu's pyramid is named "The horizon of Khufu" -
> that is stellar
>
> North chapel has stellar links ? Yes certainly.
>
> What angle was Heliopolis if not 45 degrees - real
> proof of your angle needed !
>

But we're still awaiting the geometic proof.

Contrary to what you state, Akhet Khufu is not stellar:

Quote

".....the solar interpretation receives support from the choice of the words
kha "rise" (used for sunrise) and akhet "horizon" (using a word connected to
akh, one of the terms for transfiguring sunlight).'" - Quirke, "Cult of Ra",
117

If the north chapels have stellar links, then they, too, should be included in your theory.

Again, I ask you to provide substantiation for the 45 degree angle. What is the justification for working from only one point at Heliopolis, when it's been demonstrated to be a very extensive site?

Quote

"On the site itself, for all the utter destruction one point does emerge with
force - the sheer scale of the surviving precinct....The great platform in
the area of the obelisks lies within a larger enclosure wall, over a
kilometre east to west. The entire enclosure follows a roughly rectangular
line, cut across at the northwest corner, along the line that the canalized
river branch runs today. An internal wall running roughly east-west divided
this space. North of this wall may have been an area less sacred to the sun,
but just the acreage to the south covers an extent exceptional even by
ancient Egyptian standards." - "Cult of Ra", 91

The temple precinct was over twice the area of Karnak.

> The geometry does not need to include all the
> structures of the world - only those that are part
> of the symbolism, which is the 9 pyramids.

But what sets these nine pyramids apart from the others, and makes them "part of the symbolism"?

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me