Howdy Criegs1707

Hmmmmm, you’ve seem to have dodged the question. Lets recap. You stated you had evidence from two sources. I then pointed out that in the first source LaViolette, the timing of his theory did not support your theory. You then stated that the second source supported your theory. I asked you to provide a summary of the evidence in the second source. You then gave me information from the all ready dismissed LaViolette and didn’t say anything about the source we were talking about. So again please state what the evidence is in the second source and in particular the paper that dates this particular “cosmic event”.

SC: The evidence for such people is most likely under 300 hundred feet of water which wiped away all former coastlines. Convenient for me some would accuse but nevertheless a most obvious fact given that we DO KNOW that sea levels before the last Ice Age were much lower than today, hence coastlines would have been markedly different all over the world.

If there is no evidence of their existence how can you claim that they do/did exist and use them as a basis of your idea? How did they know to ONLY live on areas where the sea coast would rise and cover up all their remains? This seems to be convenient dodge for those claiming they existed but unable to provide any evidence. Perhaps you can point to an advance civilization/country on earth that ONLY builds its culture below the first 300 feet of altitude? LOL

Oh and it needs to be civilization capable of detecting a cosmic bombardment from space.