creigs1707 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So how can you possibly know how I have used my
> references within my work? How do you know that I
> am not actually in agreement with your own
> position regarding de Santillana and von Dechend?
> You don't - you are making a great assumption.

From what I've seen of your work (which, I freely confess, wasn't very much as I found it less than engrossing), it seems, inter alia, to incorporate arguments concerned with precession - what you refer to as the precessional wheel, and so forth. Theories to the effect of the phenomenon of precession being recognized (even if not understood) in antiquity play a large part in "Hamlet's Mill". It therefore seems to me unlikely that any part of your work attacks the theories in HM. If, however, I have misunderstood, perhaps you would be kind enough to point me to the part of your work that exposes the flawed arguments of HM for what they are.

> Perhaps if you had read my work fully you would
> have greater understanding of it.

I somehow doubt that a more extensive acquaintance with your theories would lead to greater enlightenment on my part.

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me