How can someone who knows so little about the pyramids still get 56 pages out of that garbage?

Oh... I see...





He wrote really big and used lots of pictures.

I'm appalled at the lack of research this supposed "academic" put into this paper. One or two days of web research and he'd find a dozen things completely refuting his premise. A few more days and he'd realize just how silly he would look if he actually attached his name to this project.

How do you get the casing stones to match so well? Easy... you use a slabbing saw to cut them at the quarry and then put them back together in the same order on site.

Why would the backing stones be as closely fit as the casing stones? Easy... to keep the water and rodents out of the pyramid.

Why are there no copper chisels found at Giza? Easy... copper was valuable. It's like asking why no gold death masks have been found strewn around the the suburbs of Cairo.

The only valid question he asks is "How do you get ramps to the top?" Well, the lack of ramps is not evidence in favor of this crackpot theory... that's for sure.

If the author happens to be reading this, then I hope he pardons my bluntness. Anybody who didn't tell him this stuff before he went public with this was no friend of his.




Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.