<HTML>Mikey Brass wrote:
> I am in disagreement with Hancock again over the format he
> has chosen for the revised edition. You are right that
> keeping the erroneous information within the text body
> creates confusion. The standard procedure is to produce a
> text body that is as factually accurate as possible (no text
> body can ever be perfect) and to note what changes have been
> made from previous edition in the introduction or the preface.
In retrospect I should have allowed for Hancock <i>not</i> following standard procedure. I certainly expected any such correction to be flagged at the relevant point in the main body of the text.
As far as I know, <i>Keeper of Genesis</i> stands entirely uncorrected to date.</HTML>
