wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > The point I'm making is that most of the
> contibuters here, if they chose to,
> > could tear your supposed arguments to shreds.
>
>
> Boggus argument! Either case, go ahead and do it!
> are you affraid?
>

I'm far more afraid of myself than I am of you. I worry that I may choose to believe in something because of something in me rather than a desire for truth. Do you really want me to rip your theories up ? I've done it before on GHMB and here a few times. The only response I got from you was anger. And the only time anger is legitimate is if its "righteous anger" in my opinion. But we are supposedly discussing waves and frequencies, and anyway I'm not a righteous person in general so I'd prefer to try and avoid anger when I can.



> > As it is they generally seem to try and
> explain ways you could try to
> > approach understanding why thinking people
> see things differently from you.
>
> Then maybe I should be a test case for some of you
> pedantic academics!!!
>


Yes Freud would be tempted to investigate your feelings of sexual inadequacy and Jeung would wonder where your lack of power complex came from. But they would both be barking up the wrong tree in reality as the cause is irrelevant to the fact you don't care about what the truth is.



> > I get thinking people seeing things
> differently from me all the time,
> > but I try to understand why they see things
> differently before I decide
> > I actually do disagree with them.
>
> To each his own, I suppose!!!
>


Obviously you are a seeker of truth. There is nothing in you that hides away from the light. If only we could all approach life with as much courage as you do....



> > You don't care why anyone disagrees with you,
> you don't have any
> > inclination to understand why they see things
> differently.
> > That makes you the arogant one,
>
> No, it makes me the CONFIDENT one. But, I do
> accept other "constructive" and "positive"
> comments..
>


Oh so if someone agrees with your nonsense then you accept their opinion. Thats very big of you.


> > What it also does is makes people who
> actually want to understand
> > what you are trying to say tired, because to
> understand what someone
> > is saying you have to give them some degree
> of credibility.
>
> That is EXACTLY the energy response (re-action)
> that I invite. Excellent observation. I cause a
> very "specific" effect with my action and I make
> you have to deal with your own EGOCENTRIC personal
> reality demons!
>
> In other words, that pre-calculated response is
> then very easy to manipulate since it was already
> expected and you are then ONLY re-acting to my
> impulses. Think about it before you respond...
>


Are you suggesting that you realise that every sentance that comes out of your keyboard is cr@p designed purely to elicit a response in people who give sh1t about people who are lost in feces ?



>
> > When you do that and put effort into opening
> your mind to an idea you propose,
> > and then realise you haven't even started to
> research anything or even put
> > any effort whatsoever into underdstanding why
> people think differently
> > from you,
>
> DO NOT NEED TO!!! The Universe operates in
> accordance to action/reaction (cause and effect).
> Therefore, when calculating (computing) real time,
> one has direct access to the entire database.
> That is one of the MAIN benefits of using a
> frequency vs. time reference.
>
> Again, THINK ABOUT IT, before answering, unless,
> of course, you are ready for action/reaction!!!
>


Ohh you really are so full of it and I have no idea why I respond to you. So we are all deterministic beings ? Do you understand why free will is seen as having problematic elements in a deterministic universe ? I doubt it very much. You just go on in your little world of one. GHMB may be full of crazies but even there they know you as someone disconnected from reality. There are many there vastly more sane and dilligent than you. And thats saying something.



> > it feels like you've been cheated and your
> trust has been abused.
>
> On the contrary! If I induce such a "feeling" in
> you, it almost sounds like you are trying to
> reflect your own energy on me to see yourself.
> That actually is one of the side effects of this
> type of REAL time interaction...
>

Yeah you wish. The fact is you can't answer any real quetions I put to you because you can't be bothered to read the discussion about why philosophers over thousands of years have discounted any semblance of what you propose. I talk about qualias and you turn it into "quality of life". You have no idea of any of the knowledge people base their responses to you on and so you resort to subterfuge. You are a flim flam man.


> > Thats the whole reason this MB exists. Its
> strange you coming and
> > posting here when you make the people like
> Graham Hancock seem
> > like the most dilligent seaker of truth of
> all time.
>
> They are NOT ready for the truth either!!!
>

You haven't even stepped off the cart that leads to the road that leads to the oasis that leads to the undergorund stream. Haw dare you judge others when you are unable even to judge yourself!!!!


> > He at least does some degree of research
> about what he 'pronounces' on,
> > you don't even care what anyone else has
> learnt in the subjects you
> > proclaim you have the answer to.
>
> No, I do care, but I operate in a different format
> and certainly NOT in accordance to pedantic
> EGOCENTRIC degenerative and politically correct
> common reality!!!
>


Your only reality is egocentricity. Its your god and hence the capitalisation I guess....


> > Did you read anything in the link I posted ?
> I think not. You are
> > too lazy to bother reading anyone elses
> thoughts. And you call me arogant.
>
> Note that I process info/data REAL TIME, you need
> to grasp that concept first!
> Degenerative EGOCENTRISM is the exact opposite of
> what I do and it does indeed require a lot of
> background processing and analysis in order to
> grasp easy and obvious concepts that can be
> directly channeled...
>
> -wirelessguru1



I've always had a suspicion that you are just a wind up merchant. Its pretty difficult to imagine anyone beyond teenage years being so willfully ignorant. Whichever it is the fact remains I have spent much of my spare time discussing things with you and have not learnt a single thing nor enjoyed a moment of it. You take take take, and give nothing but bullshit. If you really are a wind up merchant then say now and we can all laught at it. Otherwise I'm going to take you apart as politely as I can - I refuse to risk getting banned from yet another place due to your adolescent willfull ignorance that disgusts even me who is disgusted enough at myself for the same thing.

Simon