<HTML>Hi Anthony:
Just an observation here. Crichton Miller went through a similar lambasting when he announced his discovery of the Celtic Cross as a surveying instrument. I am not sure if you are familiar with this or not, however he will soon be published ( if not already) and had to listen to the same sort of put downs as yourself. When he first announced it I was one of the first to jump into his corner because to me it made perfect sense from my surveying background. The academic community spared nothing in their assault on him and his ideas led by some of our old friends on this board who shall remain nameless, but we can all guess who they might have been.
People are amazed that there are those ( like me ) who will accept these types of discoveries at face value and without proof. They are accepted ( by me at least ) because I sense that there are many things in our world that have been lost and are simply waiting to be re-discovered. A lot of people miss the point that you do not claim to have discovered anything but have simply RE-DISCOVERED something. There is a huge difference. You have looked at certain facts of history and have looked at the problem from a different light. The fact that others are unable to do this sheds light on where we now stand as a spieces.
The bottom line is the Ancients MUST HAVE HAD A SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE METHOD of moving large stones. Was yours the one used ? Not actually relevant but it may be one possibility. If you had claimed that you could levitate these stones using a magnetic grid system I might be inclined to challenge you but since you claim to only be using simple mechanics it is not at all unreasonable that you have re-discovered a simple way of applying the forces of the Earth.
However having said all of this when the h*** are we going to see the blueprints of this device !
)
Cheers
Don Barone</HTML>