Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 27, 2024, 1:03 pm UTC    
RAW
July 31, 2001 06:14PM
<HTML>Sorry, Dave.

My mistake. I did a brainfart too. (my dumb finger went one column over too far in my notes into the autumnal-eqx and the wrong year - ahh, it feels great to be wrong sometimes). Here are the correct locations for the veqx's in their relevant epochs (e = east):

10.5kBCE : e-Leo
4000BCE : e-Taurus
2001CE (present) : w-Pisces

And the Gregorian calendar dates for when the sun sits on this spot:

10.5kBCE : June 6
4000BCE : April 22-23
2001CE (present) : March 20

So I have to backtrack here.

In 4000BCE you used March 21 as the beginning date, and again this date after navigating 25,770 yrs. Ok. What you saw was a different position for the sun, and weren't so concerned with v-eqx position in testing the accuracy of the program.

So what I'm getting at is....to find the real accuracy, don't use a calendrical date - use the position of the v-eqx (you could even use the a-eqx or eith of the solstices). So after c.26,000 years, the marker should near it's original position.

Now, when you used dates, not only is there a shift in the time of year for the markers, but there are 11 days lost during Oct of 1582. So stick to the marker positions.

The results of SNP:

From Apr 22/4000BCE (v-eqx) to Feb 20/21,776CE (v-eqx) = 21,776yrs

Location of v-eqx in both : e-Taurus

J2000 v-eqx position : 4000bce ; RA 5h 28m 45s / Dec 24 01' 25"
J2000 v-eqx position : 21,776 ; RA 5h 22m 50s / Dec 22 03' 34"

Therefore an angular offset of about 2deg, and with the sun being c.31' (half deg) in angular size, the postions of the v-eqx's can be positively identified with the modern precessional cycle defined as c.25,776 years. Also, any congruent offset in the precessional match is further exemplified becuase of centre locking features which can vary. (I was set to 25 44' 10" angular view, where a Telrad would make the RA/DEC's more acute).

Therefore, SNP refelects the accuracy of current astronomical data.

__________

Since I provided you with incorrect figures (an error in locating the data - 'duh' for me) you will have to re-do the sim to check the accuracy of SkyMap. All apologies.

Avry</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 12:56PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

RAW July 31, 2001 02:29PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 03:52PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Joanne July 31, 2001 02:40PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 03:57PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Joanne July 31, 2001 05:43PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 06:09PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

John Wall July 31, 2001 02:54PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

RAW July 31, 2001 03:20PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Katherine Reece July 31, 2001 03:23PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 03:59PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

RAW July 31, 2001 03:42PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:03PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Katherine Reece July 31, 2001 04:04PM

To Dave....

RAW July 31, 2001 03:59PM

Re: To Dave....

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:25PM

Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 04:07PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:42PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 04:16PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 06:14PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 06:24PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 06:19PM

Re: Third Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 06:35PM

Re: Third Q for you Dave

Dave Moore August 01, 2001 02:42AM

Re: Third Q for you Dave

RAW August 01, 2001 10:17AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login