Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 27, 2024, 10:49 am UTC    
July 31, 2001 06:09PM
<HTML>Joanne wrote:
>
> Dave, the correct date (Julian) for the vernal equinoc
> in 4000 BCE is April 22. As I said the sun is in Taurus and
> Sky Map shows that. The sun at equinox rises due east --
> spring and fall -- at 90 degrees. The brightest stars
> generally disappear about 20 minutes before sunrise but that
> varies with star magnitude and the local horizon affects the
> point at which objects rising can be seen.
>
> Home astronomy programs have some limitations, but can do a
> lot. All calculations become less certain the further back
> you go in time. The Egyptians did not know the stars in Leo
> as "Leo" but as decan stars with other names and other
> qualities, something Hancock ignores totally. You really
> don't need to see what was rising to refute his idea of Leo
> and the sphinx.


Indeed not, but it is very interesting, and in my mind, adds icing onto the cake of the refutation of the Sphinx/Leo episode...

Best Regards,
Dave</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 12:56PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

RAW July 31, 2001 02:29PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 03:52PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Joanne July 31, 2001 02:40PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 03:57PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Joanne July 31, 2001 05:43PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 06:09PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

John Wall July 31, 2001 02:54PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

RAW July 31, 2001 03:20PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Katherine Reece July 31, 2001 03:23PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 03:59PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

RAW July 31, 2001 03:42PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:03PM

Re: Inaccuraccies in Precessional Calculations in Software demonstrated...

Katherine Reece July 31, 2001 04:04PM

To Dave....

RAW July 31, 2001 03:59PM

Re: To Dave....

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:25PM

Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 04:07PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 04:42PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 04:16PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 06:14PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

Dave Moore July 31, 2001 06:24PM

Re: Second Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 06:19PM

Re: Third Q for you Dave

RAW July 31, 2001 06:35PM

Re: Third Q for you Dave

Dave Moore August 01, 2001 02:42AM

Re: Third Q for you Dave

RAW August 01, 2001 10:17AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login