<HTML>Hi Chris,
I'm willing to wait and see for myself about Underworld. If pressed I would say that I expect it to be as well written, readable and beguiling as his other books.
For me the main interest lies in seeing how the central notion of his wider theory, the link to 10,500BC, is handled. Considering the all round thrashing which this aspect of his ideas has received, too which no adequate response has ever been forthcoming, it could be dropped alltogether. Then again, if precision matches like Ankor Wat are now off the agenda in favour of mere pleasing symbolism, perhaps not.
Regards,
Derek
ps Claire could be forgiven a derisive hoot at the thought that she and GH were one and the same.</HTML>