Well I am afraid that in this case Google earth is in error.

I rotated the screen capture in two programs. Irfan and Swish and both agree it was 3.13.

But that is enough on that. I also checked the authors claim of 3.14 and I agreed with his deflection angle at Giza so I think my programs are correct as I have used them many times.

But I thought we were discussing my claims of 43.3811 and 54.3308 degrees for the two angles at The Bent Pyramid and how they were going to shown to be in error using a height of 200 cubits and a base of 362 cubits.

No one bothers to see if their two angles will give them 362 cubits. A fatal flaw among most orthodox researcher especially at The Red Pyramid for those who want to use 45 degrees forgetting this means that the height is 1/2 the base thus if we want to use 420 cubits we must agree to use 210 for the height and if we use 418 (not really sure where that came from) the height would be 209. Problem with most researchers, especially orthodox is that they don't follow things through. But then why should they, none of their peers ever checks their work. .

db

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db