But let's imagine that there was some truth in what this was showing us.

We know that 6633000 Royal Cubits is virtually a perfect fit for the diameter of The Moon in Royal Cubits. Let's put aside for the moment that most don't think they could have possibly known this.

We can imagine that maybe to round things off Mercury's semi major axis may have been 6633000 x 16666.666 (5 / 3 x 100,000) or 110,560,914,354 or 110,550, 000,000 Both of these numbers are extremely easy and simple to remember . You just have to remember 66 and 110 then divided these two in half and simply add three zeros for The Moon and 7 zeroes for semi major axis of Mercury. Couldn't be simpler.. much simpler than trying to remember 57,909,050 and 3472.2

So if there is any truth to this ? Would any other numbers show up that could prove or disprove what we are suggesting ?

Well I have calculated/discovered that Mercury and Earth are almost exactly in the ratio of 12 to 31. That is if we assign Mercury a value of 12 then Earth will be 31. It is almost exact. Thus if we assign the semi major axis of mercury as 110,550,000,000 cubits then Earth would be 110550000000 / 12 then times 31 or 285,587,500,000 Royal Cubits. I have also found that if we assign Earth a value of 20.62 (approx) then Mars will be 10 x Pi or 31.416 thus Mars would eqaul 435,111,344,305 Royal Cubits. I have also discovered that if we assign a value of (sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2) to Ceres the Mars distance will be sq rt of 3 Thus sq rt 3 +sq rt 2 = 3.14626437. Thus is we divided mars by sq rt of 3 and then multiply be 3.14626437 we will get the value of Ceres.

435,111,344,305 (Mars) / sq rt of 3 or 1.732050808 or 251211651699.47 x 3.14626437 equals 790,378,269,165 for Ceres

To check we simply multiply by 20.62 to get inches ... 16297599910174.37 times 0.0254 to get meters = 413959037718 and divide by 1000 to get kilometers and we get 413959038 and the present agreed upon value for Ceres is 414,703,838 km (last year it was 414,001,000 ) Thus this system checks to Ceres for 413959038 / 414001000 = 0.9999 ... pretty clever I think ....

But now for the punch line ...

I have purposely avoided Venus and saved it for the end because, well it is neat.

The modern ratio for Venus to Mercury is given as 1.868601 thus 1.868601 x Mercury's semi major axis will give us Venus, thus 110,550,000,000 x 1.868601 should give us Venus . Before I list that value I would like to suggest that maybe some of the old myths have a basis in fact and perhaps there was an interloper into our solar system and perhaps Venus might have been affected. Call it special pleading if you will it really is only for you to think about as I psot the value for Venus in cubits. Venus is Roy am Cubits is simply 110,550,000000 x 1.868601 and we get ... 20,657,384,055 hmmm ...

I took one look at this and immediately saw that it could easily be 20,620,000,000 ... so if it was 20,620,000,000 then what would that eqaul in kilometers and how close would it be ...

Simple enough to check

206,200,000,000 x 20.62 = 4251844000000 inches times 0.0254 (to get meters) = 107996837600 / 1000 = 107996837.6 kilometers

So ... was the value at one time 108,000,000 kilometers this would give us a Royal Cubit of 108,000,000 / 107996837.6 x 20.62 or 20.6194 or correct to about 0.99997

So what does this exercise prove. Just this ...

Diameter of The Moon was 6663000 Royal Cubits

Earth was 20.62 when Mars was 31.416

When Mars was sq rt of 3 Ceres was value of sq rt of 3 + sq rt of 2

But the real breakthrough is Venus for it's semi major axis is eqaul to 206,200,000,000 or the number of inches in a cubit times 10,000,000,000

And what we also need to realize that if this is what was occurring in Ancient Egypt when the pyramids were being built then the ratio of inches in a cubit could conceivably been designed on number of cubits in the semi major axis of Venus.

It is getting very tough to avoid these obvious facts.

db

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db